Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Adjunct therapies after botulinum toxin injections in spastic adults: Systematic review and SOFMER recommendations.
Allart, Etienne; Mazevet, Dominique; Idée, Stéphane; Constant Boyer, François; Bonan, Isabelle.
Afiliación
  • Allart E; CHU Lille, Neurorehabilitation Unit, 59000 Lille, France; Université Lille, INSERM UMR-S-1172, Lille Neuroscience and Cognition, 59000 Lille, France. Electronic address: etienne.allart@chru-lille.fr.
  • Mazevet D; AP-HP, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, 75013 Paris, France.
  • Idée S; CHU Strasbourg, PRM Department, 67000 Strasbourg, France.
  • Constant Boyer F; CHU Reims Champagne-Ardenne, PRM Department, Sébastopol Hospital, 51092 Reims, France.
  • Bonan I; CHU Rennes, PRM Department, University of Rennes 1 & 2, 35000 Rennes, France; Unité Empenn (ex-Visages) U1228 INSERM-INRIA, IRISA UMR CNRS 6074, Campus de Beaulieu, 35042 Rennes cedex, France.
Ann Phys Rehabil Med ; 65(2): 101544, 2022 Mar.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34091058
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Adjunct therapies (ATs) may further improve outcomes after botulinum toxin injections in spastic patients, but evidence was unclear in previous systematic reviews.

OBJECTIVE:

To assess the efficacy of non-pharmacological ATs in spastic adults according to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health and build an expert consensus-based on a Delphi process.

METHODS:

Four electronic databases were searched up to May 2020 for reports of comparative trials of non-pharmacologic ATs after botulinum toxin injections in spastic adults. Then, 25 French experts participated in a two-round Delphi process to build recommendations on the use of ATs.

RESULTS:

We included 32 studies (1202 participants, median 32/study) evaluating the effects of physical agents (n=9), joint posture procedures (JPPs, n=11), and active ATs (n=14), mainly after stroke. The average quality of articles was good for randomised controlled trials (median [interquartile range] PEDro score=7 [6-8]) but moderate (n=2) or poor (n=2) for non-randomised controlled trials (Downs & Black checklist). Meta-analysis was precluded owing to the heterogeneity of ATs, control groups and outcome measures. There is evidence for the use of JPPs except low-dose manual stretching and soft posture techniques. Continuous postures (by taping or casting) are recommended; discontinuous postures (by orthosis) may be preferred in patients with active function. Device-free or device-assisted active ATs may be beneficial in the mid-term (>3months after botulinum toxin injections), particularly when performed at a high-intensity (>3h/week) as in constraint-induced movement therapy. Self-rehabilitation remains understudied after a focal treatment, but its interest is highlighted by the experts. The use of physical agents is not recommended.

CONCLUSIONS:

JPPs and active ATs (device-assisted or device-free) may further improve impairments and activities after botulinum toxin injections. Further studies are needed to better define the best strategies for ATs as a function of the individual treatment goals, participation and quality of life. REVIEW REGISTRATION PROSPERO (CRD42018105856).
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Toxinas Botulínicas Tipo A / Fármacos Neuromusculares Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Guideline / Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Revista: Ann Phys Rehabil Med Asunto de la revista: MEDICINA FISICA / REABILITACAO Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Toxinas Botulínicas Tipo A / Fármacos Neuromusculares Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Guideline / Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Revista: Ann Phys Rehabil Med Asunto de la revista: MEDICINA FISICA / REABILITACAO Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article