Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Clinicopathologic and Genomic Landscape of Breast Carcinoma Brain Metastases.
Huang, Richard S P; Haberberger, James; McGregor, Kimberly; Mata, Douglas A; Decker, Brennan; Hiemenz, Matthew C; Lechpammer, Mirna; Danziger, Natalie; Schiavone, Kelsie; Creeden, James; Graf, Ryon P; Strowd, Roy; Lesser, Glenn J; Razis, Evangelia D; Bartsch, Rupert; Giannoudis, Athina; Bhogal, Talvinder; Lin, Nancy U; Pusztai, Lajos; Ross, Jeffrey S; Palmieri, Carlo; Ramkissoon, Shakti H.
Afiliación
  • Huang RSP; Foundation Medicine, Inc., Morrisville, North Carolina, USA.
  • Haberberger J; Foundation Medicine, Inc., Morrisville, North Carolina, USA.
  • McGregor K; Foundation Medicine, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Mata DA; Foundation Medicine, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Decker B; Foundation Medicine, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Hiemenz MC; Foundation Medicine, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Lechpammer M; Foundation Medicine, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Danziger N; Foundation Medicine, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Schiavone K; Foundation Medicine, Inc., Morrisville, North Carolina, USA.
  • Creeden J; Foundation Medicine, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Graf RP; Foundation Medicine, Inc., San Diego, California, USA.
  • Strowd R; Section on Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA.
  • Lesser GJ; Section on Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA.
  • Razis ED; 3rd Oncology Department, Hygeia Hospital, Athens, Greece.
  • Bartsch R; Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
  • Giannoudis A; Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
  • Bhogal T; Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
  • Lin NU; The Clatterbridge Cancer Centre National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
  • Pusztai L; Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Ross JS; Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
  • Palmieri C; Foundation Medicine, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Ramkissoon SH; Department of Pathology, State University of New York (SUNY) Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, New York, USA.
Oncologist ; 26(10): 835-844, 2021 10.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34105210
BACKGROUND: Among patients with breast carcinoma who have metastatic disease, 15%-30% will eventually develop brain metastases. We examined the genomic landscape of a large cohort of patients with breast carcinoma brain metastases (BCBMs) and compared it with a cohort of patients with primary breast carcinomas (BCs). MATERIAL AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 733 BCBMs tested with comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) and compared them with 10,772 primary breast carcinomas (not-paired) specimens. For a subset of 16 triple-negative breast carcinoma (TNBC)-brain metastasis samples, programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) immunohistochemistry (IHC) was performed concurrently. RESULTS: A total of 733 consecutive BCBMs were analyzed. Compared with primary BCs, BCBMs were enriched for genomic alterations in TP53 (72.0%, 528/733), ERBB2 (25.6%, 188/733), RAD21 (14.1%, 103/733), NF1 (9.0%, 66/733), BRCA1 (7.8%, 57/733), and ESR1 (6.3%,46/733) (p < .05 for all comparisons). Immune checkpoint inhibitor biomarkers such as high tumor mutational burden (TMB-high; 16.2%, 119/733); high microsatellite instability (1.9%, 14/733); CD274 amplification (3.6%, 27/733); and apolipoprotein B mRNA editing enzyme, catalytic polypeptide-like mutational signature (5.9%, 43/733) were significantly higher in the BCBM cohort compared with the primary BC cohort (p < .05 for all comparisons). When using both CGP and PD-L1 IHC, 37.5% (6/16) of patients with TNBC brain metastasis were eligible for atezolizumab based on PD-L1 IHC, and 18.8% (3/16) were eligible for pembrolizumab based on TMB-high status. CONCLUSION: We found a high prevalence of clinically relevant genomic alterations in patients with BCBM, suggesting that tissue acquisition (surgery) and/or cerebrospinal fluid for CGP in addition to CGP of the primary tumor may be clinically warranted. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: This study found a high prevalence of clinically relevant genomic alterations in patients with breast carcinoma brain metastasis (BCBM), suggesting that tissue acquisition (surgery) and/or cerebrospinal fluid for comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) in addition to CGP of the primary tumor may be clinically warranted. In addition, this study identified higher positive rates for FDA-approved immunotherapy biomarkers detected by CGP in patients with BCBM, opening a possibility of new on-label treatments. Last, this study noted limited correlation between tumor mutational burden and PD-L1 immunohistochemistry (IHC), which shows the importance of testing patients with triple-negative BCBM for immune checkpoint inhibitor eligibility with both PD-L1 IHC and CGP.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias Encefálicas / Neoplasias de la Mama Triple Negativas Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: Oncologist Asunto de la revista: NEOPLASIAS Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias Encefálicas / Neoplasias de la Mama Triple Negativas Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: Oncologist Asunto de la revista: NEOPLASIAS Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article