Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Solutions: Bridging the Diversity Gap in Urology Trainees.
Owens-Walton, Jeunice; Cooley, Keiko A L; Herbert, Amber S; Kaba, Aboubacar; Matthew-Onabanjo, Asia N; Moghalu, Odinachi; Myrie, Akya K; Dray, Elizabeth.
Afiliación
  • Owens-Walton J; Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, GA. Electronic address: j.owenswalton@gmail.com.
  • Cooley KAL; University of South Carolina School of Medicine Greenville, Prisma Health Upstate, Greenville, SC.
  • Herbert AS; University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
  • Kaba A; Saint Louis University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO.
  • Matthew-Onabanjo AN; University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA.
  • Moghalu O; University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT.
  • Myrie AK; SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University, Brooklyn, NY.
  • Dray E; University of South Carolina School of Medicine Greenville, Prisma Health Upstate, Greenville, SC.
Urology ; 162: 121-127, 2022 04.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34175332
OBJECTIVE: To address healthcare inequities, diversifying the physician workforce is an important step, and improved efforts to recruit Underrepresented in Medicine (URiM) students is vital. We aim to examine the current state of minority recruitment and provide solutions to increase diversity in urology residency training. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of self-reported race and ethnicity data for active urology trainees using the Data Resource Book by the Accreditation Council of Graduate Medical Education from 2011 to 2020. We also performed a longitudinal analysis comparing the number of urology applicants to urology trainees from 2016 to 2020 using the Electronic Residency Application Service statistics database. URiMs were designated in alignment with ACGME definitions. Categorical variables were summarized as frequencies and percentages and compared using chi-squared test between race and ethnicity. RESULTS: We identified 11,458 active urology trainees for analysis. Of these, 6638 (57.9%) identified as White, 1690 (14.7%) as Asian/Pacific Islander, 442 (3.9%) as Hispanic, 380 (3.3%) as Black, 11 (0.1%) as Native American, 608 (5.3%) as other race/ethnicity, and 1689 (14.7%) as unknown race or ethnicity. In 2011, 8.1% of trainees identified as URiM which remains the same at 8.2% in 2020. CONCLUSION: As we strive to improve patient care and support our URiM colleagues, diversity, equity, and inclusion must be prioritized. Despite increases in students entering medical school and the expansion of urology training spots, the numbers of URiM in urologic training remain stubbornly unchanged. This work highlights an area of residency training that requires critical transformation.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Urología Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Urology Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Urología Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Urology Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article