Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Is the Concurrent Use of Sorafenib and External Radiotherapy Feasible for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma? A Meta-Analysis.
Rim, Chai Hong; Park, Sunmin; Shin, In-Soo; Yoon, Won Sup.
Afiliación
  • Rim CH; Department of Radiation Oncology, Ansan Hospital, Korea University Medical College, Ansan 15355, Korea.
  • Park S; Department of Radiation Oncology, Ansan Hospital, Korea University Medical College, Ansan 15355, Korea.
  • Shin IS; Graduate School of Education, Dongguk University, Seoul 04620, Korea.
  • Yoon WS; Department of Radiation Oncology, Ansan Hospital, Korea University Medical College, Ansan 15355, Korea.
Cancers (Basel) ; 13(12)2021 Jun 10.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34200809
ABSTRACT
We evaluate the feasibility of a concurrent application of sorafenib and external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). PubMed, Embase, Medline, and Cochrane Library were searched up to 9 April 2021. The primary endpoint was grade ≥3 complications, and the secondary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Subgroup analyses were performed for studies with the EBRT targets, intrahepatic vs. non-intrahepatic lesions (e.g., extrahepatic metastases or malignant vessel involvement only). Eleven studies involving 512 patients were included in this meta-analysis. Pooled rates of gastrointestinal, hepatologic, hematologic, and dermatologic grade ≥3 toxicities were 8.1% (95% confidence interval (CI) 4.8-13.5, I2 = ~0%), 12.9% (95% CI 7.1-22.1, I2 = 22.4%), 9.1% (95% CI 3.8-20.3, I2 = 51.3%), and 6.8% (95% CI 3.8-11.7, I2 = ~0%), respectively. Pooled grade ≥3 hepatologic and hematologic toxicity rates were lower in studies targeting non-intrahepatic lesions than those targeting intrahepatic lesions (hepatologic 3.3% vs. 17.1%, p = 0.041; hematologic 3.3% vs. 16.0%, p = 0.078). Gastrointestinal and dermatologic grade ≥3 complications were not significantly different between the subgroups. Regarding OS, concurrent treatment was more beneficial than non-concurrent treatment (odds ratio 3.3, 95% CI 1.3-8.59, p = 0.015). One study reported a case of lethal toxicity due to tumor rupture and gastrointestinal bleeding. Concurrent treatment can be considered and applied to target metastatic lesions or local vessel involvement. Intrahepatic lesions should be treated cautiously by considering the target size and hepatic reserve.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Revista: Cancers (Basel) Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Revista: Cancers (Basel) Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article