Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
An Artificial Intelligence System for the Detection of Bladder Cancer via Cystoscopy: A Multicenter Diagnostic Study.
Wu, Shaoxu; Chen, Xiong; Pan, Jiexin; Dong, Wen; Diao, Xiayao; Zhang, Ruiyun; Zhang, Yonghai; Zhang, Yuanfeng; Qian, Guang; Chen, Hao; Lin, Haotian; Xu, Shizhong; Chen, Zhiwen; Zhou, Xiaozhou; Mei, Hongbing; Wu, Chenglong; Lv, Qiang; Yuan, Baorui; Chen, Zeshi; Liao, Wenjian; Yang, Xuefan; Chen, Haige; Huang, Jian; Lin, Tianxin.
Afiliación
  • Wu S; Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
  • Chen X; Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Epigenetics and Gene Regulation, Guangzhou, China.
  • Pan J; Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
  • Dong W; Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
  • Diao X; Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
  • Zhang R; Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Epigenetics and Gene Regulation, Guangzhou, China.
  • Zhang Y; Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
  • Zhang Y; Department of Urology, Renji Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
  • Qian G; Department of Urology, Shantou Central Hospital, Shantou, China.
  • Chen H; Department of Urology, Shantou Central Hospital, Shantou, China.
  • Lin H; Peng Cheng Laboratory, Shenzhen, China.
  • Xu S; Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong, China.
  • Chen Z; State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Centre, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
  • Zhou X; Centre for Precision Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
  • Mei H; Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
  • Wu C; Departmemt of Urology, The First Hospital Affiliated to Army Medical University, Chongqing, China.
  • Lv Q; Departmemt of Urology, The First Hospital Affiliated to Army Medical University, Chongqing, China.
  • Yuan B; Department of Urology, Shenzhen Second People's Hospital, Shenzhen, China.
  • Chen Z; Department of Urology, Shenzhen Second People's Hospital, Shenzhen, China.
  • Liao W; Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
  • Yang X; Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
  • Chen H; Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
  • Huang J; Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
  • Lin T; Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
J Natl Cancer Inst ; 114(2): 220-227, 2022 02 07.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34473310
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Cystoscopy plays an important role in bladder cancer (BCa) diagnosis and treatment, but its sensitivity needs improvement. Artificial intelligence has shown promise in endoscopy, but few cystoscopic applications have been reported. We report a Cystoscopy Artificial Intelligence Diagnostic System (CAIDS) for BCa diagnosis.

METHODS:

In total, 69 204 images from 10 729 consecutive patients from 6 hospitals were collected and divided into training, internal validation, and external validation sets. The CAIDS was built using a pyramid scene parsing network and transfer learning. A subset (n = 260) of the validation sets was used for a performance comparison between the CAIDS and urologists for complex lesion detection. The diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using the Clopper-Pearson method.

RESULTS:

The diagnostic accuracies of the CAIDS were 0.977 (95% CI = 0.974 to 0.979) in the internal validation set and 0.990 (95% CI = 0.979 to 0.996), 0.982 (95% CI = 0.974 to 0.988), 0.978 (95% CI = 0.959 to 0.989), and 0.991 (95% CI = 0.987 to 0.994) in different external validation sets. In the CAIDS vs urologists' comparisons, the CAIDS showed high accuracy and sensitivity (accuracy = 0.939, 95% CI = 0.902 to 0.964; sensitivity = 0.954, 95% CI = 0.902 to 0.983) with a short latency of 12 seconds, much more accurate and quicker than the expert urologists.

CONCLUSIONS:

The CAIDS achieved accurate BCa detection with a short latency. The CAIDS may provide many clinical benefits, from increasing the diagnostic accuracy for BCa, even for commonly misdiagnosed cases such as flat cancerous tissue (carcinoma in situ), to reducing the operation time for cystoscopy.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria / Cistoscopía Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: J Natl Cancer Inst Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria / Cistoscopía Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: J Natl Cancer Inst Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article