Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Emotional distress in neuro-ICU survivor-caregiver dyads: The recovering together randomized clinical trial.
Bannon, Sarah M; Cornelius, Talea; Gates, Melissa V; Lester, Ethan; Mace, Ryan A; Popok, Paula; Macklin, Eric A; Rosand, Jonathan; Vranceanu, Ana-Maria.
Afiliación
  • Bannon SM; Integrated Brain Health Clinical and Research Program.
  • Cornelius T; Department of Medicine.
  • Gates MV; Integrated Brain Health Clinical and Research Program.
  • Lester E; Integrated Brain Health Clinical and Research Program.
  • Mace RA; Integrated Brain Health Clinical and Research Program.
  • Popok P; Integrated Brain Health Clinical and Research Program.
  • Macklin EA; Biostatistics Center.
  • Rosand J; Henry and Allison McCance Center for Brain Health.
  • Vranceanu AM; Integrated Brain Health Clinical and Research Program.
Health Psychol ; 41(4): 268-277, 2022 Apr.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34498896
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

Emotional distress is common in both survivors and their informal caregivers following admission to a neuroscience intensive care unit (Neuro-ICU) and can negatively affect their individual recovery and quality of life. Neuro-ICU survivor-caregiver dyads can influence each other's emotional distress over time, but whether such influence emerges during dyadic treatment remains unknown. The present study involved secondary data analysis of Neuro-ICU dyads enrolled in a randomized clinical trial of a dyadic resiliency intervention, Recovering Together (RT), versus a health education attention placebo control to test dyadic similarities in emotional distress before and after treatment.

METHOD:

Data were collected from 58 dyads following Neuro-ICU admission. Emotional distress (depression, anxiety, and posttraumatic stress) was assessed at baseline, 6 weeks (postintervention), and 12 weeks later. Nonindependence within survivor-caregiver dyads was examined (i.e., correlations between cross-sectional symptoms and changes in symptoms over time); mutual influence of emotional functioning over time (i.e., "partner effects") was examined using cross-lagged path analyses.

RESULTS:

There were strong, positive cross-sectional correlations between survivor and caregiver distress at postintervention and follow-up and between changes in survivor and caregiver distress from baseline to postintervention and postintervention to follow-up. There were no partner effects.

CONCLUSIONS:

Neuro-ICU survivors and their informal caregivers show similar changes in emotional distress after treatment. These findings highlight the potential benefits of intervening on both survivor and caregiver distress following Neuro-ICU admission. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Cuidadores / Distrés Psicológico Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: Health Psychol Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Cuidadores / Distrés Psicológico Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: Health Psychol Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article