Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Fully automated grading system for the evaluation of punctate epithelial erosions using deep neural networks.
Qu, Jing-Hao; Qin, Xiao-Ran; Li, Chen-Di; Peng, Rong-Mei; Xiao, Ge-Ge; Cheng, Jian; Gu, Shao-Feng; Wang, Hai-Kun; Hong, Jing.
Afiliación
  • Qu JH; Department of Ophthalmology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
  • Qin XR; Beijing Key Laboratory of Restoration of Damaged Ocular Nerve, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
  • Li CD; Research Center for Brain-inspired Intelligence, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
  • Peng RM; Department of Ophthalmology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
  • Xiao GG; Beijing Key Laboratory of Restoration of Damaged Ocular Nerve, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
  • Cheng J; Department of Ophthalmology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
  • Gu SF; Beijing Key Laboratory of Restoration of Damaged Ocular Nerve, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
  • Wang HK; Department of Ophthalmology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
  • Hong J; Beijing Key Laboratory of Restoration of Damaged Ocular Nerve, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Br J Ophthalmol ; 107(4): 453-460, 2023 04.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34670751
PURPOSE: The goal was to develop a fully automated grading system for the evaluation of punctate epithelial erosions (PEEs) using deep neural networks. METHODS: A fully automated system was developed to detect corneal position and grade staining severity given a corneal fluorescein staining image. The fully automated pipeline consists of the following three steps: a corneal segmentation model extracts corneal area; five image patches are cropped from the staining image based on the five subregions of extracted cornea; a staining grading model predicts a score for each image patch from 0 to 3, and automated grading score for the whole cornea is obtained from 0 to 15. Finally, the clinical grading scores annotated by three ophthalmologists were compared with automated grading scores. RESULTS: For corneal segmentation, the segmentation model achieved an intersection over union of 0.937. For punctate staining grading, the grading model achieved a classification accuracy of 76.5% and an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.940 (95% CI 0.932 to 0.949). For the fully automated pipeline, Pearson's correlation coefficient between the clinical and automated grading scores was 0.908 (p<0.01). Bland-Altman analysis revealed 95% limits of agreement between the clinical and automated grading scores of between -4.125 and 3.720 (concordance correlation coefficient=0.904). The average time required for processing a single stained image during pipeline was 0.58 s. CONCLUSION: A fully automated grading system was developed to evaluate PEEs. The grading results may serve as a reference for ophthalmologists in clinical trials and residency training procedures.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Redes Neurales de la Computación / Córnea Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Br J Ophthalmol Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Redes Neurales de la Computación / Córnea Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Br J Ophthalmol Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article