Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A biomechanical in-vitro study on an alternative fixation technique of the pubic symphysis for open book injuries of the pelvis.
Böhler, Christoph; Benca, Emir; Hirtler, Lena; Kolarik, Florian; Zalaudek, Martin; Mayr, Winfried; Windhager, Reinhard.
Afiliación
  • Böhler C; Department of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. Electronic address: christoph.boehler@meduniwien.ac.at.
  • Benca E; Department of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
  • Hirtler L; Division of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
  • Kolarik F; Department of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
  • Zalaudek M; Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
  • Mayr W; Center for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
  • Windhager R; Department of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Injury ; 53(2): 339-345, 2022 Feb.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34895919
PURPOSE: Implant failure rates remain high after plate fixation in pelvic ring injuries. The aim of this study was to compare an alternative fixation technique with suture-button devices and anterior plate fixation in partially stable open-book injuries. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We acquired 16 human fresh frozen anatomic pelvic specimens. The sacrospinous, sacrotuberous, and anterior sacroiliac ligaments were bilaterally released, and the pubic symphysis transected to simulate a partially stable open-book (AO/OTA 61-B3.1) injury. The specimens were randomly assigned to the two fixation groups. In the first group two suture-button devices were placed in a criss-crossed position through the symphysis. In second group a six-hole plate with standard 3.5 unlocked bicortical screws was used for fixation. Biomechanical testing was performed on a servo-hydraulic apparatus simulating bilateral stance, as described by Hearn and Varga. Cyclic compression loading with a progressively increasing peak load (0.5 N/cycle) was applied until failure. The failure mode, the load and the number of cycles at failure and the proximal and distal distance of the symphysis during testing were compared. RESULTS: There was no implant failure in either of the two groups. Failures occurred in nine pelvises (56.2%) at the fixation between the sacrum and the mounting jig and in seven pelvises (43.8%) in the sacroiliac joint. Neither the ultimate load nor the number of cycles at failure differed between the surgical techniques (p = 0.772; p = 0.788, respectively). In the suture button group the mean ultimate load was 874.5 N and the number of cycles at failure was 1907.9. In the plate group values were 826.1 N and 1805.6 cycles, respectively. No significant differences at proximal and distal diastasis of the symphysis were monitored during the whole loading process. CONCLUSION: The fixation with suture button implants showed comparable results to anterior plate fixation in open-book injuries of the pelvis.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Sínfisis Pubiana Idioma: En Revista: Injury Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Sínfisis Pubiana Idioma: En Revista: Injury Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article