Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Impact of Early COVID-19 Pandemic on Common Ophthalmic Procedures Volumes: A US Claims-Based Analysis.
Azad, Amee D; Mishra, Kapil; Lee, Eric B; Chen, Evan; Nguyen, Alexander; Parikh, Ravi; Mruthyunjaya, Prithvi.
Afiliación
  • Azad AD; Byers Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California, USA.
  • Mishra K; Byers Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California, USA.
  • Lee EB; Byers Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California, USA.
  • Chen E; Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
  • Nguyen A; Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
  • Parikh R; Manhattan Retina and Eye Consultants, New York, New York, USA.
  • Mruthyunjaya P; Department of Ophthalmology New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA.
Ophthalmic Epidemiol ; 29(6): 604-612, 2022 12.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34935591
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

The COVID-19 pandemic has had a profound effect on the delivery of healthcare in the United States and globally. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of COVID-19 on common ophthalmic procedure utilization and normalization to pre-pandemic daily rates.

METHODS:

Leveraging a national database, Clinformatics™ DataMart (OptumInsight, Eden Prairie, MN), procedure frequencies and daily averages, defined by Current Procedural Terminology codes, of common elective and non-elective procedures within multiple ophthalmology sub-specialties were calculated. Interrupted time-series analysis with a Poisson regression model and smooth spline functions was used to model trends in pre-COVID-19 (January 1, 2018-February 29, 2020) and COVID-19 (March 1, 2020-June 30, 2020) periods.

RESULTS:

Of 3,583,231 procedures in the study period, 339,607 occurred during the early COVID-19 time period. Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor injections (44,412 to 39,774, RR 1.01, CI 0.99-1.02; p = .212), retinal detachment repairs (1,290 to 1,086, RR 1.07, CI 0.99-1.15; p = .103), and glaucoma drainage implants/trabeculectomies (706 to 487, RR 0.93, CI 0.83-1.04; p = .200) remained stable. Cataract surgery (61,421 to 33,054, RR 0.77; CI 0.76-0.78; p < .001), laser peripheral iridotomy (1,875 to 890, RR 0.82, CI 0.76-0.88; p < .001), laser trabeculoplasty (2,680 to 1,753, RR 0.79, CI 0.74-0.84; p < .001), and blepharoplasty (1,522 to 797, RR 0.71, CI 0.66-0.77; p < .001) all declined significantly. All procedures except laser iridotomy returned to pre-COVID19 rates by June 2020.

CONCLUSION:

Most ophthalmic procedures that significantly declined during the COVID-19 pandemic were elective procedures. Among these, the majority returned to 2019 daily averages by June 2020.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Trabeculectomía / Implantes de Drenaje de Glaucoma / Terapia por Láser / COVID-19 Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Ophthalmic Epidemiol Asunto de la revista: EPIDEMIOLOGIA / OFTALMOLOGIA Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Trabeculectomía / Implantes de Drenaje de Glaucoma / Terapia por Láser / COVID-19 Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Ophthalmic Epidemiol Asunto de la revista: EPIDEMIOLOGIA / OFTALMOLOGIA Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article