Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Benefits and harms of non-surgical and non-pharmacological management of osteoporotic vertebral fractures: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Bolton, Karen; Wallis, Jason A; Taylor, Nicholas F.
Afiliación
  • Bolton K; Acute & Aged Medicine: Emergency Department / General Medicine, Eastern Health, Australia. Electronic address: Bolton@easternhealth.org.au.
  • Wallis JA; Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health & Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Victoria, Australia; Monash-Cabrini Department of Musculoskeletal Health and Clinical Epidemiology, Cabrini Health, Victoria, Australia; Department of Physiotherapy, Podiatry, Prosthetics and Orthotics, La Trobe University, Victoria, Australia.
  • Taylor NF; Department of Physiotherapy, Podiatry, Prosthetics and Orthotics, La Trobe University, Victoria, Australia; Allied Health Clinical Research Office, Eastern Health, Victoria, Australia.
Braz J Phys Ther ; 26(1): 100383, 2022.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35063701
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Osteoporotic vertebral fractures affect a large number of older adults

OBJECTIVES:

Systematically review evidence of the benefits and harms of non-surgical and non-pharmacological management of people with osteoporotic vertebral fractures compared with standard care (control); and evaluate the benefits and harms of non-surgical and non-pharmacological management of people with osteoporotic vertebral fractures compared with an alternative non-pharmacological, non-invasive intervention.

DESIGN:

Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Five electronic databases (CINAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE, PUBMED, and COCHRANE) were searched. Eligible trials included participants with primary osteoporosis and at least one vertebral fracture diagnosed on radiographs, with treatment that was non-surgical and non-pharmacological involving more than one session.

RESULTS:

Twenty randomized controlled trials were included with 2083 participants with osteoporotic vertebral fractures. Exercise, bracing, multimodal therapy, electrotherapy, and taping were investigated interventions. Meta-analyses provided low certainty evidence that exercise interventions compared to no exercise were effective in reducing pain in patients with osteoporotic vertebral fractures (mean difference (MD)= 1.01; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.08, 1.93), and low certainty evidence that rigid bracing intervention compared with no bracing was effective in reducing pain in patients with osteoporotic vertebral fractures (MD= 2.61; 95%CI 0.95, 4.27). Meta-analyses showed no differences in harms between exercise and no exercise groups. No health-related quality of life or activity improvements were demonstrated for exercise interventions, bracing, electrotherapy, or multimodal interventions.

CONCLUSIONS:

Exercise and rigid bracing as management for patients with osteoporotic vertebral fractures may have a small benefit for pain without increasing risk of harm. TRIAL REGISTRATION PROSPERO registration number CRD42012002936.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral / Fracturas Osteoporóticas Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Revista: Braz J Phys Ther Asunto de la revista: MEDICINA FISICA / REABILITACAO Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral / Fracturas Osteoporóticas Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Revista: Braz J Phys Ther Asunto de la revista: MEDICINA FISICA / REABILITACAO Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article