Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Microbiology Assessments in Critically Ill Patients.
Brink, Adrian John; Centner, Chad M; Opperman, Stefan.
Afiliación
  • Brink AJ; Division of Medical Microbiology, Department of Pathology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
  • Centner CM; National Health Laboratory Service, Groote Schuur Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa.
  • Opperman S; Division of Medical Microbiology, Department of Pathology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Semin Respir Crit Care Med ; 43(1): 75-96, 2022 02.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35172360
ABSTRACT
The prevalence of suspected or proven infections in critically ill patients is high, with a substantial attributable risk to in-hospital mortality. Coordinated guidance and interventions to improve the appropriate microbiological assessment for diagnostic and therapeutic decisions are therefore pivotal. Conventional microbiology follows the paradigm of "best practice" of specimen selection and collection, governed by laboratory processing and standard operating procedures, and informed by the latest developments and trends. In this regard, the preanalytical phase of a microbiological diagnosis is crucial since inadequate sampling may result in the incorrect diagnosis and inappropriate management. In addition, the isolation and detection of contaminants interfere with multiple intensive care unit (ICU) processes, which confound the therapeutic approach to critically ill patients. To facilitate bedside enablement, the microbiology laboratory should provide expedited feedback, reporting, and interpretation of results. Compared with conventional microbiology, novel rapid and panel-based diagnostic strategies have the clear advantages of a rapid turnaround time, the detection of many microorganisms including antimicrobial resistant determinants and thus promise substantial improvements in health care. However, robust data on the clinical evaluation of rapid diagnostic tests in presumed sepsis, sepsis and shock are extremely limited and more rigorous intervention studies, focusing on direct benefits for critically ill patients, are pivotal before widespread adoption of their use through the continuum of ICU stay. Advocating the use of these diagnostics without firmly establishing which patients would benefit most, how to interpret the results, and how to treat according to the results obtained, could in fact be counterproductive with regards to diagnostic "best practice" and antimicrobial stewardship. Thus, for the present, they may supplement but not yet supplant conventional microbiological assessments.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Sepsis / Programas de Optimización del Uso de los Antimicrobianos Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: Semin Respir Crit Care Med Asunto de la revista: TERAPIA INTENSIVA Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Sepsis / Programas de Optimización del Uso de los Antimicrobianos Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: Semin Respir Crit Care Med Asunto de la revista: TERAPIA INTENSIVA Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article