Optimization of Detection of Gadodiamide Brain Retention in Rats Using Quantitative T2 Mapping and Intraperitoneal Administration.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Currently, the gadolinium retention in the brain after the use of contrast agents is studied by T1 -weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (T1 w) and T1 mapping. The former does not provide easily quantifiable data and the latter requires prolonged scanning and is sensitive to motion. T2 mapping may provide an alternative approach. Animal studies of gadolinium retention are complicated by repeated intravenous (IV) dosing, whereas intraperitoneal (IP) injections might be sufficient. HYPOTHESIS: T2 mapping will detect the changes in the rat brain due to gadolinium retention, and IP administration is equivalent to IV for long-term studies. STUDY TYPE Prospective longitudinal. ANIMAL MODEL A total of 31 Sprague-Dawley rats administered gadodiamide IV (N = 8) or IP (N = 8), or saline IV (N = 6) or IP (N = 9) 4 days per week for 5 weeks. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCES A 7 T, T1 w, and T2 mapping. ASSESSMENT T2 relaxation and image intensities in the deep cerebellar nuclei were measured pre-treatment and weekly for 5 weeks. Then brains were assessed for neuropathology (N = 4) or gadolinium content using inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS, N = 12). STATISTICAL TESTS Repeated measures analysis of variance with post hoc Student-Newman-Keuls tests and Hedges' effect size. RESULTS: Gadolinium was detected by both approaches; however, T2 mapping was more sensitive (effect size 2.32 for T2 vs. 0.95 for T1 w), and earlier detection (week 3 for T2 vs. week 4 for T1 w). ICP-MS confirmed the presence of gadolinium (3.076 ± 0.909 nmol/g in the IV group and 3.948 ± 0.806 nmol/g in the IP group). There was no significant difference between IP and IV groups (ICP-MS, P = 0.109; MRI, P = 0.696). No histopathological abnormalities were detected in any studied animal. CONCLUSION: T2 relaxometry detects gadolinium retention in the rat brain after multiple doses of gadodiamide irrespective of the route of administration. EVIDENCE LEVEL 1 TECHNICAL EFFICACY Stage 1.