Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Temporal learning in the suprasecond range: insights from cognitive style.
Teghil, Alice; D'Antonio, Fabrizia; Di Vita, Antonella; Guariglia, Cecilia; Boccia, Maddalena.
Afiliación
  • Teghil A; Department of Psychology, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Via dei Marsi, 78, 00185, Rome, Italy. alice.teghil@uniroma1.it.
  • D'Antonio F; Cognitive and Motor Rehabilitation and Neuroimaging Unit, IRCCS Fondazione Santa Lucia, Rome, Italy. alice.teghil@uniroma1.it.
  • Di Vita A; Department of Human Neuroscience, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
  • Guariglia C; Department of Human Neuroscience, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
  • Boccia M; Department of Psychology, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Via dei Marsi, 78, 00185, Rome, Italy.
Psychol Res ; 87(2): 568-582, 2023 Mar.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35344099
ABSTRACT
The acquisition of information on the timing of events or actions (temporal learning) occurs in both the subsecond and suprasecond range. However, although relevant differences between participants have been reported in temporal learning, the role of dimensions of individual variability in affecting performance in such tasks is still unclear. Here we investigated this issue, assessing the effect of field-dependent/independent cognitive style on temporal learning in the suprasecond range. Since different mechanisms mediate timing when a temporal representation is self-generated, and when it depends on an external referent, temporal learning was assessed in two conditions. Participants observed a stimulus across six repetitions and reproduced it. Unbeknownst to them, in an internally-based learning (IBL) condition, the stimulus duration was fixed within a trial, although the number of events defining it varied; in an externally-cued learning (ECL) condition, the stimulus was defined by the same number of events within each trial, although its duration varied. The effect of the reproduction modality was also assessed (motor vs. perceptual). Error scores were higher in IBL compared to ECL; the reverse was true for variability. Field-independent individuals performed better than field-dependent ones only in IBL, as further confirmed by correlation analyses. Findings provide evidence that differences in dimensions of variability in high-level cognitive functioning, such as field dependence/independence, significantly affect temporal learning in the suprasecond range, and that this effect depends on the type of temporal representation fostered by the specific task demands.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Percepción del Tiempo Idioma: En Revista: Psychol Res Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Percepción del Tiempo Idioma: En Revista: Psychol Res Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article