Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Determining Which Patients Require Preoperative Pelvic Radiotherapy Before Curative-Intent Surgery and/or Ablation for Metastatic Rectal Cancer.
Yu, Jeong Il; Yoo, Gyu Sang; Park, Hee Chul; Choi, Doo Ho; Lee, Woo Yong; Yun, Seong Hyeon; Kim, Hee Cheol; Cho, Yong Beom; Huh, Jung Wook; Park, Yoon Ah; Shin, Jung Kyong; Park, Joon Oh; Kim, Seung Tae; Park, Young Suk; Lee, Jeeyun; Kang, Won Ki; Lim, Ho Yeong; Hong, Jung Yong.
Afiliación
  • Yu JI; Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Yoo GS; Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Park HC; Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea. hee.ro.park@gmail.com.
  • Choi DH; Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Lee WY; Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea. wooyong123.lee@samsung.com.
  • Yun SH; Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Kim HC; Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Cho YB; Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Huh JW; Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Park YA; Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Shin JK; Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Park JO; Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Kim ST; Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Park YS; Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Lee J; Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Kang WK; Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Lim HY; Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Hong JY; Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 2022 Apr 04.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35377061
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The aim of this study is to determine the optimal indications for preoperative pelvic radiotherapy (RT) in patients with metastatic rectal cancer who underwent curative-intent surgical resection and/or ablation.

METHODS:

Between January 2000 and October 2019, 246 patients who met our inclusion criteria were enrolled. Preoperative RT was performed in 22 patients (8.9%). Lower margin below the peritoneal reflection (p < 0.001), mesorectal fascia (MRF) invasion (p = 0.02), and lateral pelvic lymph node (LPLN) involvement (p = 0.005) were more frequent in the preoperative RT group.

RESULTS:

During the median follow-up period of 13.3 months (interquartile range [IQR] 6.0-36.3 months), local recurrence (LR) was identified in 60 patients (24.4%). It was the first site of recurrence in 45 of them (18.3%). Among them, three patients were in the preoperative RT group. On multivariable analysis, lower margin below the peritoneal reflection, MRF invasion, LPLN involvement, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level ≥ 10 ng/mL before treatment, and preoperative RT were significant prognostic factors for LR-free survival (LRFS). In the patient group without any risk factors, the 2-year LRFS rate was 94.9% without preoperative RT. In the patient group with one or more risk factors, the 2-year LRFS was 64.4% without and 95.2% with preoperative RT.

CONCLUSION:

LR developed in about 25% of patients within 2 years. Preoperative RT should be considered, especially in patients with a risk factor for LR, including lower margin below the peritoneal reflection, MRF invasion, LPLN involvement, or CEA ≥ 10 ng/mL before treatment.

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: Ann Surg Oncol Asunto de la revista: NEOPLASIAS Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: Ann Surg Oncol Asunto de la revista: NEOPLASIAS Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article