Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Prevalence of Cannabinoid (CBD) Use in Orthopaedic Sports Medicine Patients.
Deckey, David G; Doan, Matthew; Hassebrock, Jeffrey D; Patel, Karan A; Economopoulos, Kostas; Tokish, John M; Bingham, Joshua S; Chhabra, Anikar.
Afiliación
  • Deckey DG; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.
  • Doan M; Alix School of Medicine, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale, Arizona, USA.
  • Hassebrock JD; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.
  • Patel KA; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.
  • Economopoulos K; Alix School of Medicine, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale, Arizona, USA.
  • Tokish JM; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.
  • Bingham JS; Alix School of Medicine, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale, Arizona, USA.
  • Chhabra A; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.
Orthop J Sports Med ; 10(4): 23259671221087629, 2022 Apr.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35400139
ABSTRACT

Background:

Although there is some evidence that cannabinoid (CBD) products may provide a therapeutic effect for musculoskeletal pain, little is known about the usage patterns or their prevalence of use in orthopaedic sports medicine patients.

Purpose:

To report the prevalence and perceived self-efficacy of CBD products in patients evaluated in an orthopaedic sports medicine clinic. Study

Design:

Descriptive epidemiology study. Level of evidence, 2.

Methods:

The study population consisted of new patients who visited an orthopaedic surgery sports medicine clinic at a large academic center for consultation with a surgeon between August 2020 and March 2021. All patients were asked to complete a survey that assessed perceived pain and effectiveness of CBD products and other nonsurgical treatment modalities using the Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation score (range, 0-100) and the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NRS). Descriptive factors were collected via chart review. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize the data.

Results:

Overall, 823 patients completed the survey (45.4% female; mean age, 51 years [range, 18-87 years]; mean body mass index, 28.9 [range, 17.2-58.4]). Body areas involved included 285 shoulders, 44 elbows, 76 hips, 276 knees, 58 ankles, and 77 other. Of these patients, 19% (152/823) endorsed the use of CBD products before their initial evaluation. The mean NRS for pain was significantly different between non-CBD users and CBD users (5.6 vs 6.1; P = .029). CBD users were significantly more likely to have tried other nonoperative modalities compared with nonusers, including nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (79.6% vs 69.8%; P = .032), bracing (44.7% vs 34.6%; P = .024), steroid injections (38.8% vs 21.6%; P < .001), and physical therapy (54% vs 36.1%; P < .001). In addition, 30.9% of CBD utilizers reported marijuana use compared with 2.8% of non-CBD users (P < .001) for management of their pain.

Conclusion:

In the current study, 19% of patients had used CBD products to manage joint-related issues. Sports medicine providers should be aware of this high incidence of usage and the potential interactions CBD products may have with other treatment modalities. Further studies are needed to assess the effectiveness of CBD as a therapeutic agent and the specific interactions it has with other drugs and other forms of treatment.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Prevalence_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: Orthop J Sports Med Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Prevalence_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: Orthop J Sports Med Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article