Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Is Nonoperative Treatment Appropriate for All Patients With Type 1 Tibial Spine Fractures? A Multicenter Study of the Tibial Spine Research Interest Group.
Shimberg, Jilan L; Leska, Tomasina M; Cruz, Aristides I; Ellis, Henry B; Patel, Neeraj M; Yen, Yi-Meng; Schmale, Gregory A; Mistovich, R Justin; Fabricant, Peter D; Ganley, Theodore J; Green, Daniel W; Johnson, Benjamin; Kushare, Indranil; Lee, R Jay; McKay, Scott D; Milbrandt, Todd A; Rhodes, Jason; Sachleben, Brant; Traver, Jessica L.
Afiliación
  • Shimberg JL; Investigation performed at University Hospitals Rainbow Babies and Children's Hospital, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
  • Leska TM; Investigation performed at University Hospitals Rainbow Babies and Children's Hospital, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
  • Cruz AI; Investigation performed at University Hospitals Rainbow Babies and Children's Hospital, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
  • Ellis HB; Investigation performed at University Hospitals Rainbow Babies and Children's Hospital, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
  • Patel NM; Investigation performed at University Hospitals Rainbow Babies and Children's Hospital, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
  • Yen YM; Investigation performed at University Hospitals Rainbow Babies and Children's Hospital, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
  • Schmale GA; Investigation performed at University Hospitals Rainbow Babies and Children's Hospital, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
  • Mistovich RJ; Investigation performed at University Hospitals Rainbow Babies and Children's Hospital, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
  • Fabricant PD; Investigation performed at University Hospitals Rainbow Babies and Children's Hospital, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
  • Ganley TJ; Investigation performed at University Hospitals Rainbow Babies and Children's Hospital, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
  • Green DW; Investigation performed at University Hospitals Rainbow Babies and Children's Hospital, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
  • Johnson B; Investigation performed at University Hospitals Rainbow Babies and Children's Hospital, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
  • Kushare I; Investigation performed at University Hospitals Rainbow Babies and Children's Hospital, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
  • Lee RJ; Investigation performed at University Hospitals Rainbow Babies and Children's Hospital, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
  • McKay SD; Investigation performed at University Hospitals Rainbow Babies and Children's Hospital, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
  • Milbrandt TA; Investigation performed at University Hospitals Rainbow Babies and Children's Hospital, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
  • Rhodes J; Investigation performed at University Hospitals Rainbow Babies and Children's Hospital, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
  • Sachleben B; Investigation performed at University Hospitals Rainbow Babies and Children's Hospital, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
  • Traver JL; Investigation performed at University Hospitals Rainbow Babies and Children's Hospital, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Orthop J Sports Med ; 10(6): 23259671221099572, 2022 Jun.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35677019
ABSTRACT

Background:

Type 1 tibial spine fractures are nondisplaced or ≤2 mm-displaced fractures of the tibial eminence and anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) insertion that are traditionally managed nonoperatively with immobilization.

Hypothesis:

Type 1 fractures do not carry a significant risk of associated injuries and therefore do not require advanced imaging or additional interventions aside from immobilization. Study

Design:

Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

Methods:

We reviewed 52 patients who were classified by their treating institution with type 1 tibial spine fractures. Patients aged ≤18 years with pretreatment plain radiographs and ≤ 1 year of follow-up were included. Pretreatment imaging was reviewed by 4 authors to assess classification agreement among the treating institutions. Patients were categorized into 2 groups to ensure that outcomes represented classic type 1 fracture patterns. Any patient with universal agreement among the 4 authors that the fracture did not appear consistent with a type 1 classification were assigned to the type 1+ (T1+) group; all other patients were assigned to the true type 1 (TT1) group. We evaluated the rates of pretreatment imaging, concomitant injuries, and need for operative interventions as well as treatment outcomes overall and for each group independently.

Results:

A total of 48 patients met inclusion criteria; 40 were in the TT1 group, while 8 were in the T1+ group, indicating less than universal agreement in the classification of these fractures. Overall, 12 (25%) underwent surgical treatment, and 12 (25%) had concomitant injuries. Also, 8 patients required additional surgical management including ACL reconstruction (n = 4), lateral meniscal repair (n = 2), lateral meniscectomy (n = 1), freeing an incarcerated medial meniscus (n = 1), and medial meniscectomy (n = 1).

Conclusion:

The classification of type 1 fractures can be challenging. Contrary to prior thought, a substantial number of patients with these fractures (>20%) were found to have concomitant injuries. Overall, surgical management was performed in 25% of patients in our cohort.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials Idioma: En Revista: Orthop J Sports Med Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials Idioma: En Revista: Orthop J Sports Med Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article