Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Transcroporal Artificial Urinary Sphincter Placement With Closure of Corporal Bodies-A Long-Term Analysis of Functional Outcomes.
Maurer, Valentin; Dahlem, Roland; Howaldt, Marian; Riechardt, Silke; Fisch, Margit; Ludwig, Tim A; Engel, Oliver.
Afiliación
  • Maurer V; Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
  • Dahlem R; Department of Urology, Asklepios Medical Center Hamburg-Harburg, Hamburg, Germany.
  • Howaldt M; Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
  • Riechardt S; Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
  • Fisch M; Department of Urology, Asklepios Medical Center Hamburg-Harburg, Hamburg, Germany.
  • Ludwig TA; Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
  • Engel O; Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Front Surg ; 9: 918011, 2022.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35722536
Objectives: An artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) is the gold standard for postoperative stress urinary incontinence (SUI). The transcorporal AUS (TC) placement constitutes the main salvage option in high-risk patients suffering from SUI with fragile urethras. The literature analyzing long-term outcomes with respect to explantation rates, continence, and erectile function is scarce. Methods and Patients: Retrospective data collection was performed in 2011. TC was applied according to a standardized protocol. TC was implanted after bulbar urethroplasty or double-cuff (DC) explantation. After TC placement, the tunica albuginea was closed in order to minimize the risk of postoperative bleedings and erectile dysfunction. Activation was performed 6 weeks postoperatively. Further follow-up (FU) was scheduled 6/24 months postoperatively and every 2 years thereafter. Primary/secondary endpoints were explantation/objective, subjective, and social continence rates. Objective or social continence was defined as the use of 0 pads/day or <2 pads/day, respectively. Thereupon, postoperative bleedings and erectile function were analyzed. Results: A total of 39 high-risk patients were available for analysis. The median age was 72 years. In total, 84.6%, 10.3%, and 2.6% had a history of radical prostatectomy, TURP, and radical cystectomy, respectively. In total, 61.5% had a history of radiation therapy of the prostate, 41% had a history of urethral surgery, and 95% had a history of double cuff explantation. The median FU was 27 months. Objective, subjective, and social continence were 54.5%, 69.7%, and 78.8%, respectively. The median pad usage was 1 pad/day [1-2.5]. Only one patient suffered from a postoperative hematoma. In total, 15.4% of the patients were able to have an erection preoperatively, compared to 7.7% after TC placement. The estimated mean explantation-free survival of the TC was 83 months in the Kaplan-Meier analysis. Conclusions: TC AUS implantation constitutes a viable salvage approach in high-risk SUI patients with a mean device survival of almost 7 years and high social continence rates of almost 80%. An intraoperative closure of the tunica albuginea after TC placement allows for very low rates of postoperative hematoma and supports postoperative erectile rigidity.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Guideline Idioma: En Revista: Front Surg Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Guideline Idioma: En Revista: Front Surg Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article