Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Performance of the Neck Imaging Reporting and Data System as applied by general neuroradiologists to predict recurrence of head and neck cancers.
Lee, Jonathan; Kaht, Dagan; Ali, Syed; Johnson, Scott; Bullen, Jennifer; Karakasis, Christopher; Lamarre, Eric; Geiger, Jessica; Koyfman, Shlomo; Stock, Sarah.
Afiliación
  • Lee J; Imaging Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
  • Kaht D; Imaging Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
  • Ali S; Imaging Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
  • Johnson S; Imaging Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
  • Bullen J; Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
  • Karakasis C; Imaging Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
  • Lamarre E; Head and Neck Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
  • Geiger J; Hematology and Oncology, Taussig Cancer Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
  • Koyfman S; Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
  • Stock S; Imaging Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Head Neck ; 44(10): 2257-2264, 2022 10.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35801334
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The Neck Imaging Reporting and Data System (NI-RADS) is used to assess imaging after head and neck cancer treatment. We evaluated NI-RADS with general neuroradiologists rather than with head and neck subspecialists.

METHODS:

Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging examinations with/without positron emission tomography from May 2018 to September 2020 were retrospectively identified. NI-RADS scores at the primary site and lymph nodes were provided by 21 neuroradiologists. Recurrence status was based on clinical and imaging findings. Area under the curve (AUC) was used to assess accuracy.

RESULTS:

We assessed 608 scans from 464 patients. For NI-RADS categories 1, 2, and 3, primary site recurrence rates were 5%, 29%, and 65% with AUC of 0.765, while lymph node recurrence rates were 3%, 10%, and 80% with AUC of 0.820.

CONCLUSIONS:

NI-RADS as used by general neuroradiologists is effective in separating head and neck cancers into discrete categories for predicting recurrent disease.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: Head Neck Asunto de la revista: NEOPLASIAS Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: Head Neck Asunto de la revista: NEOPLASIAS Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article