Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Final overall survival analysis from the phase III J-ALEX study of alectinib versus crizotinib in ALK inhibitor-naïve Japanese patients with ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer.
Hotta, K; Hida, T; Nokihara, H; Morise, M; Kim, Y H; Azuma, K; Seto, T; Takiguchi, Y; Nishio, M; Yoshioka, H; Kumagai, T; Watanabe, S; Goto, K; Satouchi, M; Kozuki, T; Shukuya, T; Nakagawa, K; Mitsudomi, T; Yamamoto, N; Asakawa, T; Yoshimoto, T; Takata, S; Tamura, T.
Afiliación
  • Hotta K; Center for Innovative Clinical Medicine, Okayama University Hospital, Okayama. Electronic address: khotta@okayama-u.ac.jp.
  • Hida T; Department of Thoracic Oncology, Aichi Cancer Center, Nagoya, Aichi.
  • Nokihara H; Department of Thoracic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo.
  • Morise M; Department of Respiratory Medicine, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya.
  • Kim YH; Department of Respiratory Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto.
  • Azuma K; Division of Respirology, Neurology, and Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Fukuoka.
  • Seto T; Department of Thoracic Oncology, National Hospital Organization Kyusyu Cancer Center, Fukuoka.
  • Takiguchi Y; Department of Medical Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba.
  • Nishio M; Department of Thoracic Medical Oncology, The Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo.
  • Yoshioka H; Department of Thoracic Oncology, Kansai Medical University Hospital, Hirakata, Osaka.
  • Kumagai T; Department of Thoracic Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka.
  • Watanabe S; Department of Respiratory Medicine and Infectious Diseases, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata.
  • Goto K; Department of Thoracic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Chiba.
  • Satouchi M; Department of Thoracic Oncology, Hyogo Cancer Center, Akashi, Hyogo.
  • Kozuki T; Department of Thoracic Oncology and Medicine, National Hospital Organization Shikoku Cancer Center, Matsuyama, Ehime.
  • Shukuya T; Department of Respiratory Medicine, Juntendo University, Tokyo.
  • Nakagawa K; Department of Medical Oncology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka-Sayama, Osaka.
  • Mitsudomi T; Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka-Sayama, Osaka.
  • Yamamoto N; Third Department of Internal Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama.
  • Asakawa T; Biometrics Department, Chugai Pharmaceuticals Co. Ltd, Tokyo.
  • Yoshimoto T; Biometrics Department, Chugai Pharmaceuticals Co. Ltd, Tokyo.
  • Takata S; Oncology Clinical Development Department, Chugai Pharmaceuticals Co. Ltd, Tokyo.
  • Tamura T; Thoracic Center, St. Luke's International Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
ESMO Open ; 7(4): 100527, 2022 08.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35843080
BACKGROUND: Mature progression-free survival (PFS) data from the phase III J-ALEX study showed superiority for alectinib versus crizotinib [hazard ratio (HR) 0.37, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.26-0.52; median PFS 34.1 versus 10.2 months, respectively] in advanced ALK (anaplastic lymphoma kinase)-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Overall survival (OS) data were immature (HR 0.80, 99.8799% CI 0.35-1.82) at the time of data cut-off (30 June 2018). We report final OS data after ≥5 years of follow-up. PATIENTS AND METHODS: ALK inhibitor naive Japanese patients who were chemotherapy naive or had received one prior chemotherapy regimen were enrolled. Patients were randomized to receive alectinib 300 mg (n = 103) or crizotinib 250 mg (n = 104) twice daily until progressive disease, unacceptable toxicity, death, or withdrawal. The primary endpoint was independent review facility-assessed PFS, with OS (not fully powered) as a secondary endpoint. RESULTS: Median duration of OS follow-up was 68.6 months with alectinib and 68.0 months with crizotinib. Treatment with alectinib did not prolong OS relative to crizotinib (HR 1.03, 95.0405% CI 0.67-1.58; P = 0.9105). Five-year OS rates were 60.9% (95% CI 51.4-70.3) with alectinib and 64.1% (95% CI 54.9-73.4) with crizotinib. In total, 91.3% (n = 95/104) of crizotinib-treated patients and 46.6% (n = 48/103) of alectinib-treated patients received at least one subsequent anticancer therapy. After study drug discontinuation, 78.8% of patients in the crizotinib arm switched to alectinib, while 10.7% of patients in the alectinib arm switched to crizotinib as a first subsequent anticancer therapy. Patients randomized to crizotinib tended to switch treatment earlier than those randomized to alectinib. CONCLUSION: Final OS analysis from J-ALEX did not show superiority of alectinib to crizotinib; this result was most likely confounded by treatment crossover. Alectinib remains a standard of care for the treatment of patients with advanced ALK-positive NSCLC.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas / Neoplasias Pulmonares Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials País/Región como asunto: Asia Idioma: En Revista: ESMO Open Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas / Neoplasias Pulmonares Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials País/Región como asunto: Asia Idioma: En Revista: ESMO Open Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article