Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Public Conceptions of Scientific Consensus.
Slater, Matthew H; Huxster, Joanna K; Scholfield, Emily R.
Afiliación
  • Slater MH; Department of Philosophy, Bucknell University, Lewisburg, PA USA.
  • Huxster JK; Environmental Studies, Eckerd College, St. Petersburg, FL USA.
  • Scholfield ER; Departments of Philosophy and Biology, Bucknell University, Lewisburg, PA USA.
Erkenntnis ; : 1-22, 2022 Jul 18.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35873138
Despite decades of concerted efforts to communicate to the public on important scientific issues pertaining to the environment and public health, gaps between public acceptance and the scientific consensus on these issues remain stubborn. One strategy for dealing with this shortcoming has been to focus on the existence of scientific consensus on the relevant matters. Recent science communication research has added support to this general idea, though the interpretation of these studies and their generalizability remains a matter of contention. In this paper, we describe results of a qualitative interview study on different models of scientific consensus and the relationship between such models and trust of science, finding that familiarity with scientific consensus is rarer than might be expected. These results suggest that consensus messaging strategies may not be effective.

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Idioma: En Revista: Erkenntnis Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Idioma: En Revista: Erkenntnis Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article