Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Effects of Desk Pedaling Work Rate on Concurrent Work Performance among Physically Inactive Adults: A Randomized Experiment.
Rovniak, Liza S; Cho, Jay; Freivalds, Andris; Kong, Lan; DE Araujo-Greecher, Marielena; Bopp, Melissa; Sciamanna, Christopher N; Rothrock, Ling.
Afiliación
  • Rovniak LS; Division of General Internal Medicine, Departments of Medicine and Public Health Sciences, Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, PA.
  • Cho J; Department of Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA.
  • Freivalds A; Department of Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA.
  • Kong L; Division of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Department of Public Health Sciences, Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, PA.
  • DE Araujo-Greecher M; Department of Psychology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA.
  • Bopp M; Department of Kinesiology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA.
  • Sciamanna CN; Division of General Internal Medicine, Departments of Medicine and Public Health Sciences, Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, PA.
  • Rothrock L; Department of Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA.
Med Sci Sports Exerc ; 55(1): 20-31, 2023 01 01.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35977110
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

Under-desk pedaling devices could help reduce health risks associated with the global decline in work-related energy expenditure. However, the optimal pedaling work rate to facilitate concurrent work performance among physically inactive adults is unclear. We examined the effects of two light-intensity pedaling work rates on physically inactive adults' work performance.

METHODS:

We recruited equal numbers of older (45-65 yr) versus younger (20-44 yr), male versus female, and overweight/obese (body mass index [BMI], 25-35 kg·m -2 ) versus normal weight (BMI, 18.5-24.9 kg·m -2 ) participants. Using a Graeco-Latin square design, participants ( n = 96) completed a laboratory experiment to evaluate the effects of using an under-desk pedaling device at two seated light-intensity work rates (17 and 25 W), relative to a seated nonpedaling condition on objectively measured typing, reading, logical reasoning, and phone task performance. Ergonomic comfort under each pedaling work rate was also assessed. Equivalence tests were used to compare work performance under the pedaling versus nonpedaling conditions.

RESULTS:

Treatment fidelity to the 17- and 25-W pedaling work rates exceeded 95%. Mean work performance scores for each pedaling and nonpedaling condition were equivalent under alpha = 0.025. Age, sex, and BMI did not significantly moderate the effect of pedaling on work performance. Participants reported greater ergonomic comfort while completing work tasks at the 17-W relative to the 25-W work rate.

CONCLUSIONS:

Physically inactive adults obtained similar work performance scores under the 17- and 25-W pedaling and the nonpedaling conditions, suggesting that either pedaling work rate could help reduce health risks of sedentary work time. The 17-W work rate yielded greater ergonomic comfort and may be an appropriate starting point for introducing diverse inactive workers to under-desk pedaling.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Conducta Sedentaria / Rendimiento Laboral Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials Idioma: En Revista: Med Sci Sports Exerc Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Conducta Sedentaria / Rendimiento Laboral Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials Idioma: En Revista: Med Sci Sports Exerc Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article