Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Slow recruitment in the HIMALAIA study: lessons for future clinical trials in patients with delayed cerebral ischemia after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage based on feasibility data.
Gathier, Celine S; van der Jagt, Mathieu; van den Bergh, Walter M; Dankbaar, Jan Willem; Rinkel, Gabriel J E; Slooter, Arjen J C.
Afiliación
  • Gathier CS; Department of Intensive Care Medicine, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands. c.s.gathier-4@umcutrecht.nl.
  • van der Jagt M; Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, 3508, Utrecht, The Netherlands. c.s.gathier-4@umcutrecht.nl.
  • van den Bergh WM; Department of Intensive Care Adults and Erasmus MC Stroke Center, Erasmus MC - University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Dankbaar JW; Department of Critical Care, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
  • Rinkel GJE; Department of Radiology, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
  • Slooter AJC; Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, 3508, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Pilot Feasibility Stud ; 8(1): 193, 2022 Aug 30.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36042527
BACKGROUND: Our randomized clinical trial on induced hypertension in patients with delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) was halted prematurely due to unexpected slow recruitment rates. This raised new questions regarding recruitment feasibility. As our trial can therefore be seen as a feasibility trial, we assessed the reasons for the slow recruitment, aiming to facilitate the design of future randomized trials in aSAH patients with DCI or other critically ill patient categories. METHODS: Efficiency of recruitment and factors influencing recruitment were evaluated, based on the patient flow in the two centers that admitted most patients during the study period. We collected numbers of patients who were screened for eligibility, provided informed consent, and developed DCI and who eventually were randomized. RESULTS: Of the 862 aSAH patients admitted in the two centers during the course of the trial, 479 (56%) were eligible for trial participation of whom 404 (84%) were asked for informed consent. Of these, 188 (47%) provided informed consent, of whom 50 (27%) developed DCI. Of these 50 patients, 12 (24%) could not be randomized due to a logistic problem or a contraindication for induced hypertension emerging at the time of randomization, and four (8%) were missed for randomization. Eventually, 34 patients were randomized and received intervention or control treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Enrolling patients in a randomized trial on a treatment strategy for DCI proved unfeasible: only 1 out of 25 admitted and 1 out of 14 eligible patients could eventually be randomized. These rates, caused by a large proportion of ineligible patients, a small proportion of patients providing informed consent, and a large proportion of patients with contraindications for treatment, can be used to make sample size calculations for future randomized trials in DCI or otherwise critically ill patients. Facilitating informed consent through improved provision of information on risks, possible benefits, and study procedures may result in improved enrolment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The original trial was prospectively registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01613235), date of registration 07-06-2012.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials Idioma: En Revista: Pilot Feasibility Stud Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials Idioma: En Revista: Pilot Feasibility Stud Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article