Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography: National expenditures and cost-effectiveness.
Zeng, Xiaohui; Zhou, Zhen; Luo, Xia; Liu, Qiao.
Afiliación
  • Zeng X; Department of Nuclear Medicine/PET Image Center, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.
  • Zhou Z; Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, Australia.
  • Luo X; Department of Pharmacy, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.
  • Liu Q; Department of Pharmacy, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.
Front Public Health ; 10: 977550, 2022.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36249202
ABSTRACT

Objective:

To compare the cost-effectiveness of undertaking low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening for early detection of lung cancer (LC) with different frequencies within the healthcare system of China, and estimate the additional national healthcare expenditure and five-year LC mortality associated with different screening frequencies. Material and

methods:

A Markov model was established using national LC epidemiological data from the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, demographic data from the Chinese Statistical Yearbook, and cost and effectiveness data mainly from the Cancer Screening Program in China. The model included thirty sex-specific screening strategies, which were classified by initial screening age (30, 35, 40, 45, and 50), and screening intervals (intervals at single time point, 1, 2, 5, 10, and 20 years). The main model outputs were incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs), additional national healthcare expenditure and five-year LC mortality.

Results:

The ICERs for LDCT screening strategies vs. non-screening strategy ranged from $16,086 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) to $3,675,491 per QALY in the male cohort, and from $36,624 per QALY to $5,943,556 per QALY in the female cohort. The annual increment national healthcare expenditures related to LDCT screening were varied from $0.25 to $13.39 billion, with the lower cost in the cohort with older screening ages and lower screening frequencies. More frequent screening with LDCT was associated with a greater reduction in LC death an annual LDCT screening was linked to an estimated reduction in five-year LC death by 27.27-29.07%, while a one-off screening was linked to a reduction by 5.56-5.83%.

Conclusion:

Under a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of three times the Chinese gross domestic product (GDP) per capita (US $37,654), annual screening with an initiating age at 50 was most cost-effective in both male and female cohorts. By taking into account both the national healthcare expenditures and the effect of LDCT screening, our study results support undertaking LDCT screening annually from 50 years old in general populations.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Detección Precoz del Cáncer / Neoplasias Pulmonares Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Health_economic_evaluation / Screening_studies Idioma: En Revista: Front Public Health Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Detección Precoz del Cáncer / Neoplasias Pulmonares Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Health_economic_evaluation / Screening_studies Idioma: En Revista: Front Public Health Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article