Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Preference-based comparison of quality of life associated with vision loss in Black and White ophthalmic populations in the US.
Brown, Gary C; Brown, Melissa M; Sharma, Sanjay.
Afiliación
  • Brown GC; Center for Value-Based Medicine, Hilton Head, SC; Wills Eye Hospital, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA; Department of Ophthalmology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA. Electronic address: gbrown@valuebasedmedicine.com.
  • Brown MM; Center for Value-Based Medicine, Hilton Head, SC; Wills Eye Hospital, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA; Department of Ophthalmology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA.
  • Sharma S; Department of Ophthalmology, Hotel Dieu Hospital, Kingston, ON.
Can J Ophthalmol ; 2022 Nov 23.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36427536
PURPOSE: Utilities are preference-based estimates, typically ranging from 1.00 (normal health) to 0.00 (death), that quantify the quality-of-life improvement associated with a health care intervention. In conjunction with length-of-life gain, depending on the intervention, they measure total interventional value gain in quality-adjusted life years that can be integrated with costs in cost-utility analysis. We believed it relevant to ascertain whether race was a differentiating factor confounding utilities related to vision. METHODS: An analysis of cross-sectional data obtained from consecutive Black and White ophthalmic outpatients from the Wills Eye Hospital (Philadelphia, PA.) practices who participated in a long-standing time trade-off (TTO) vision utility study from 1999 to 2016 was undertaken. Each participant was interviewed by a researcher using a previously validated and reliable TTO vision utility acquisition instrument and assigned to 1 of 5 vision categories according to acuity in the best-seeing eye. Utility outcomes were compared using both the 2-sided t test and the Mann-Whitney U test. RESULTS: Eleven hundred and twenty-five consecutive patients able to successfully answer the questions were included. For vision of 20/200-20/800, White/Black mean vision utilities were, respectively, 0.58/0.59 (p = 0.84); for vision of 20/70-20/100, they were, respectively, 0.72/0.70 (p = 0.85); for vision of 20/50-20/60, they were, respectively, 0.78/0.79 (p = 0.86); for vision of 20/25-20/50, they were, respectively, 0.84/0.88 (p = 0.16); and for vision of 20/20, they were, respectively, 0.91/0.90 (p = 0.43). CONCLUSIONS: TTO vision utilities in Black and White ophthalmic patient cohorts were alike at various levels of visual acuity. This suggests a similar quality of life and that TTO vision utilities used in cost-utility analysis do not require adjustment for race in Black and White ophthalmic populations in the US.

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: Can J Ophthalmol Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: Can J Ophthalmol Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article