Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Response to First-Line Treatment with Immune-Checkpoint Inhibitors in Patients with Advanced Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Multicenter, Retrospective Analysis from the German ADOReg Registry.
Haist, Maximilian; Stege, Henner; Lang, Berenice Mareen; Tsochataridou, Aikaterini; Salzmann, Martin; Mohr, Peter; Schadendorf, Dirk; Ugurel, Selma; Placke, Jan-Malte; Weichenthal, Michael; Gutzmer, Ralf; Leiter, Ulrike; Kaatz, Martin; Haferkamp, Sebastian; Berking, Carola; Heppt, Markus; Tschechne, Barbara; Schummer, Patrick; Gebhardt, Christoffer; Grabbe, Stephan; Loquai, Carmen.
Afiliación
  • Haist M; Department of Dermatology, University Medical Center Mainz, 55131 Mainz, Germany.
  • Stege H; Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
  • Lang BM; Department of Microbiology & Immunology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
  • Tsochataridou A; Department of Dermatology, University Medical Center Mainz, 55131 Mainz, Germany.
  • Salzmann M; Department of Dermatology, University Medical Center Mainz, 55131 Mainz, Germany.
  • Mohr P; Department of Dermatology, University Medical Center Mainz, 55131 Mainz, Germany.
  • Schadendorf D; Department of Dermatology and National Center for Tumor Diseases, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Ugurel S; Department of Dermatology, Elbe Kliniken Buxtehude, 21614 Buxtehude, Germany.
  • Placke JM; Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Essen, 45122 Essen, Germany.
  • Weichenthal M; Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Essen, 45122 Essen, Germany.
  • Gutzmer R; Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Essen, 45122 Essen, Germany.
  • Leiter U; Department of Dermatology, Campus Kiel, University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein Hospital, 24105 Kiel, Germany.
  • Kaatz M; Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Skin Cancer Center Hannover, 30625 Hannover, Germany.
  • Haferkamp S; Center of Dermatooncology, Department of Dermatology, Eberhard-Karls-University, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany.
  • Berking C; Department of Dermatology, Wald-Klinikum Gera, 07548 Gera, Germany.
  • Heppt M; Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany.
  • Tschechne B; Department of Dermatology, Uniklinikum Erlangen, CCC Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg, 91054 Erlangen, Germany.
  • Schummer P; Department of Dermatology, Uniklinikum Erlangen, CCC Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg, 91054 Erlangen, Germany.
  • Gebhardt C; KRH Klinikum Neustadt am Rübenberge, Specialist for Internal Medicine Hematology and Oncology, 31535 Neustadt, Germany.
  • Grabbe S; Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Würzburg, 97080 Würzburg, Germany.
  • Loquai C; Skin Cancer Center, Department of Dermatology and Venereology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), 20246 Hamburg, Germany.
Cancers (Basel) ; 14(22)2022 Nov 11.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36428636
Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) is a common malignancy of the skin and has an overall favorable outcome, except for patients with an advanced stage of the disease. The efficacy of checkpoint inhibitors (CPI) for advanced cSCC has been demonstrated in recent clinical studies, but data from real-world cohorts and trial-ineligible cSCC patients are limited. We retrospectively investigated patients with advanced cSCC who have been treated with CPI in a first-line setting at eight German skin cancer centers registered within the multicenter registry ADOReg. Clinical outcome parameters including response, progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS), time-to-next-treatment (TTNT), and toxicity were analyzed and have been stratified by the individual immune status. Among 39 evaluable patients, the tumor response rate (rwTRR) was 48.6%, the median PFS was 29.0 months, and the median OS was not reached. In addition, 9 patients showed an impaired immune status due to immunosuppressive medication or hematological diseases. Our data demonstrated that CPI also evoked tumor responses among immunocompromised patients (rwTRR: 48.1 vs. 50.0%), although these responses less often resulted in durable remissions. In line with this, the median PFS (11 vs. 40 months, p = 0.059), TTNT (12 months vs. NR, p = 0.016), and OS (29 months vs. NR, p < 0.001) were significantly shorter for this patient cohort. CPI therapy was well tolerated in both subcohorts with 15% discontinuing therapy due to toxicity. Our real-world data show that first-line CPI therapy produced strong and durable responses among patients with advanced cSCC. Immunocompromised patients were less likely to achieve long-term benefit from anti-PD1 treatment, despite similar tumor response rates.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials Idioma: En Revista: Cancers (Basel) Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials Idioma: En Revista: Cancers (Basel) Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article