Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Machine learning approaches linking brain function to behavior in the ABCD STOP task.
Yuan, Dekang; Hahn, Sage; Allgaier, Nicholas; Owens, Max M; Chaarani, Bader; Potter, Alexandra; Garavan, Hugh.
Afiliación
  • Yuan D; Department of Psychiatry, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont, USA.
  • Hahn S; Department of Psychiatry, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont, USA.
  • Allgaier N; Department of Psychiatry, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont, USA.
  • Owens MM; Department of Psychiatry, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont, USA.
  • Chaarani B; Department of Psychiatry, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont, USA.
  • Potter A; Department of Psychiatry, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont, USA.
  • Garavan H; Department of Psychiatry, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont, USA.
Hum Brain Mapp ; 44(4): 1751-1766, 2023 03.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36534603
The stop-signal task (SST) is one of the most common fMRI tasks of response inhibition, and its performance measure, the stop-signal reaction-time (SSRT), is broadly used as a measure of cognitive control processes. The neurobiology underlying individual or clinical differences in response inhibition remain unclear, consistent with the general pattern of quite modest brain-behavior associations that have been recently reported in well-powered large-sample studies. Here, we investigated the potential of multivariate, machine learning (ML) methods to improve the estimation of individual differences in SSRT with multimodal structural and functional region of interest-level neuroimaging data from 9- to 11-year-olds children in the ABCD Study. Six ML algorithms were assessed across modalities and fMRI tasks. We verified that SST activation performed best in predicting SSRT among multiple modalities including morphological MRI (cortical surface area/thickness), diffusion tensor imaging, and fMRI task activations, and then showed that SST activation explained 12% of the variance in SSRT using cross-validation and out-of-sample lockbox data sets (n = 7298). Brain regions that were more active during the task and that showed more interindividual variation in activation were better at capturing individual differences in performance on the task, but this was only true for activations when successfully inhibiting. Cortical regions outperformed subcortical areas in explaining individual differences but the two hemispheres performed equally well. These results demonstrate that the detection of reproducible links between brain function and performance can be improved with multivariate approaches and give insight into a number of brain systems contributing to individual differences in this fundamental cognitive control process.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Encéfalo / Imagen de Difusión Tensora Idioma: En Revista: Hum Brain Mapp Asunto de la revista: CEREBRO Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Encéfalo / Imagen de Difusión Tensora Idioma: En Revista: Hum Brain Mapp Asunto de la revista: CEREBRO Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article