Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Shared Decision Making and the Management of Intact Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: A Scoping Review of the Literature.
Machin, Matthew; Van Herzeele, Isabelle; Ubbink, Dirk; Powell, Janet T.
Afiliación
  • Machin M; Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK. Electronic address: matthew.machin12@imperial.ac.uk.
  • Van Herzeele I; Department of Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
  • Ubbink D; Amsterdam University Medical Centres, location University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Powell JT; Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg ; 65(6): 839-849, 2023 06.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36720426
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to summarise the current knowledge of shared decision making (SDM) in patients facing a treatment decision about an intact abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), and to identify where further evidence is needed. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched on 18 July 2021. An updated search was run on 31 May 2022 for relevant studies published from 1 January 2000 to 31 May 2022. REVIEW METHODS: This scoping review was undertaken in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines following a pre-defined protocol, retrieving studies reporting on aspects of SDM in those with intact AAAs. Qualitative synthesis of the articles was performed, and the results grouped according to theme. RESULTS: Fifteen articles reporting on a total of 1 344 participants (age range 62-74 years) from hospital vascular surgery clinics with intact AAAs were included. Studies were observational (n = 9), non-randomised studies of an intervention (n = 3), and randomised clinical trials (n = 3). The first theme was the preferences and practice of SDM. The proportion of patients preferring SDM ranged from 58% to 95% (three studies), although objective rating of SDM practice was consistently < 50% (three studies). Clinician training improved SDM practice. The second theme was poor provision of information. Fewer than half of patients (0 - 46%) surveyed were informed about all available treatment options (three studies). Publicly available information sources were rated as poor. The third theme concerned the utility of decision making support tools (DSTs). Two randomised trials demonstrated that the provision of DSTs improves patient knowledge and agreement between patient preference and repair type received but not objective measures of SDM for patients with AAAs. CONCLUSION: SDM for patients with an intact AAA appears to be in its infancy. Most patients with an AAA want SDM, but this is not commonly applied. Most patients with an AAA do not receive adequate information for SDM, although the use of bespoke DSTs leaves patients better informed to facilitate SDM.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal / Toma de Decisiones Conjunta Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Revista: Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg Asunto de la revista: ANGIOLOGIA Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal / Toma de Decisiones Conjunta Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Revista: Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg Asunto de la revista: ANGIOLOGIA Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article