Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Remotely delivered, individualized, and self-directed gait modification for knee osteoarthritis: A pilot trial.
Charlton, Jesse M; Krowchuk, Natasha M; Eng, Janice J; Li, Linda C; Hunt, Michael A.
Afiliación
  • Charlton JM; Department of Physical Therapy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada; Graduate Programs in Rehabilitation Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada; Motion Analysis and Biofeedback Laboratory, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada; Centre for Aging SMART at
  • Krowchuk NM; Department of Physical Therapy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada; Motion Analysis and Biofeedback Laboratory, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
  • Eng JJ; Department of Physical Therapy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada; Centre for Aging SMART at Vancouver Coastal Health, Vancouver, Canada.
  • Li LC; Department of Physical Therapy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada; Arthritis Research Canada, Vancouver, Canada.
  • Hunt MA; Department of Physical Therapy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada; Motion Analysis and Biofeedback Laboratory, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada; Centre for Aging SMART at Vancouver Coastal Health, Vancouver, Canada.
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) ; 106: 105981, 2023 06.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37201438
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Gait modification interventions have reported variable results and relied on in-person biofeedback limiting clinical accessibility. Our objective was to assess a remotely delivered and self-directed gait modification for knee osteoarthritis.

METHODS:

This was an unblinded, 2-arm, delayed control, randomized pilot trial (NCT04683913). Adults aged ≥50 years with symptomatic medial knee osteoarthritis were randomized to an immediate group (Week 0 Baseline, Intervention; Week 6 Follow-up, Week 10 Retention) or delayed group (Week 0 Baseline, Wait Period, Week 6 Secondary Baseline, Intervention, Week 12 Follow-up, Week 16 Retention). Participants practiced modifying their foot progression angle "as much as was comfortable" while receiving support via weekly telerehabilitation appointments and remote monitoring with an instrumented shoe. Primary outcomes included participation, foot progression angle modification magnitude, confidence, difficulty, and satisfaction while secondary outcomes included symptoms and knee biomechanics during gait.

RESULTS:

We screened 134 people and randomized 20. There was no loss to follow up and 100% attendance at the telerehabilitation appointments. By follow up, participants reported high confidence (8.6/10), low difficulty (2.0/10), and satisfaction (75%) with the intervention and no significant adverse events. Foot progression angle was modified by 11.4° ± 5.6, which was significantly different (p < 0.001, η2g = 0.8) when compared between groups. No other between-group differences were significant, while several significant pre-post improvements in pain (d = 0.6, p = 0.006) and knee moments (d = 0.6, p = 0.01) were observed.

INTERPRETATION:

A personalized, self-directed gait modification supported with telerehabilitation is feasible, and the preliminary effects on symptoms and biomechanics align with past trials. A larger trial is warranted to evaluate efficacy.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Osteoartritis de la Rodilla Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) Asunto de la revista: ENGENHARIA BIOMEDICA / FISIOLOGIA Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Osteoartritis de la Rodilla Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) Asunto de la revista: ENGENHARIA BIOMEDICA / FISIOLOGIA Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article