Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Evaluation of microMend wound closure device in repairing skin lacerations.
Nizami, Tarek; Beaudoin, Francesca; Suner, Selim; Aluisio, Adam; Bhatt, Reena A; Jay, Gregory D.
Afiliación
  • Nizami T; Emergency Medicine, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.
  • Beaudoin F; Department of Emergency Medicine, Brown University Warren Alpert Medical School, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.
  • Suner S; Department of Emergency Medicine, Brown University Warren Alpert Medical School, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.
  • Aluisio A; Department of Emergency Medicine, Brown University Warren Alpert Medical School, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.
  • Bhatt RA; Department of Plastic Surgery, Brown University Warren Alpert Medical School, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.
  • Jay GD; Department of Plastic Surgery, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.
Emerg Med J ; 40(8): 564-568, 2023 Aug.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37220958
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

microMend, a novel microstaple skin closure device, may be able to close simple lacerations. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of using microMend to close these wounds in the ED.

METHODS:

This was an open-label, single-arm clinical study conducted at two EDs within a large urban academic medical centre. Wounds closed with microMend underwent assessments performed at days 0, 7, 30 and 90. Photographs of treated wounds were rated by two plastic surgeons using a 100 mm visual analogue scale (VAS) and a wound evaluation scale (WES), which has a best possible score of 6. Participants rated pain during application and both participants and providers rated their satisfaction with the device.

RESULTS:

Thirty-one participants were enrolled in the study 48% were female and the mean age of participants was 45.6 (95% CI 39.1 to 52.1). The mean wound length was 2.35 cm (95% CI 1.77 to 2.92), with a range of 1-10 cm. Mean VAS and WES scores at day 90 as evaluated by two plastic surgeons were 84.1 mm (95% CI 80.2 to 87.9) and 4.91 (95% CI 4.54 to 5.29), respectively. The mean pain score with application of the devices was 7.28 mm (95% CI 2.88 to 11.68) on a scale of 0-100 mm using VAS. Local anaesthesia was used in 9 patients (29%, 95% CI 20.7 to 37.3) of participants (of whom 5 required deep sutures). Ninety per cent (90%) of participants rated their overall assessment of the device as excellent (74%) or good (16%) at day 90. There were no serious adverse events in any participants in the study.

CONCLUSION:

microMend appears to be an acceptable alternative for closing skin lacerations in the ED, providing good cosmetic results, with high levels of satisfaction by patients and providers. Randomised trials are needed to compare microMend with other wound closure products. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT03830515.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Traumatismos de los Tejidos Blandos / Laceraciones Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials Idioma: En Revista: Emerg Med J Asunto de la revista: MEDICINA DE EMERGENCIA Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Traumatismos de los Tejidos Blandos / Laceraciones Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials Idioma: En Revista: Emerg Med J Asunto de la revista: MEDICINA DE EMERGENCIA Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article