Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Analysis of Positive Results of 18F-FDG PET/CT Imaging after Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Lymphoma.
Dai, Na; Cai, Rongcui; Deng, Shengming; Sang, Shibiao.
Afiliación
  • Dai N; Department of Nuclear Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou 215006, China.
  • Cai R; Department of Nuclear Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou 215006, China.
  • Deng S; Department of Nuclear Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou 215006, China.
  • Sang S; Department of Nuclear Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou 215006, China.
Diagnostics (Basel) ; 13(12)2023 Jun 11.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37370922
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

The purpose of this study was to differentiate between false-positive and true-positive positron emission tomography (PET) results after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (SCT) for lymphoma involvement by analyzing several clinical variables and specific imaging features. PATIENTS AND

METHODS:

Patients with lymphoma who received SCT and underwent post-transplantation 18F-FDG PET/CT scans between January 2013 and April 2021 at our institution were included. Associations between PET positivity and related clinical information were assessed using t-tests and χ2 tests. The significance of variables differentiating benign lesions from malignant FDG-avid lesions was evaluated by logistic regression analysis. Survival probabilities were derived from Kaplan-Meier curves and compared using the log-rank test.

RESULTS:

A total of 185 patients (235 post-transplantation PET/CT scans) were enrolled in our present study. Compared with those with true-positive PET results, patients with false-positive PET results exhibited a better prognosis. For the autologous SCT group, false-positive cases were more commonly seen when FDG-avid foci appeared outside the sites of the original disease (p = 0.004), and the integrated CT imaging showed negative results (p = 0.000). In multivariate logistic regression analysis, integrated CT results were the only significant factor. For the allogeneic SCT group, false-positive cases were significantly more commonly seen when DS = 4 (p = 0.046), FDG-avid foci appeared outside the sites of the original disease (p = 0.022), and the integrated CT imaging showed negative results (p = 0.001). In a multivariate logistic regression analysis, whether FDG-avid foci were in the sites of the original disease and integrated CT results were both significant factors.

CONCLUSION:

False-positive FDG uptake in post-transplantation PET was not uncommon. Several variables could provide an important reference to differentiate false-positive from true-positive post-SCT PET results for lymphoma involvement. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ChiCTR2300067355.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Diagnostics (Basel) Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Diagnostics (Basel) Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article