Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Optimal maintenance strategy following FOLFOX plus anti-EGFR induction therapy in patients with RAS wild type metastatic colorectal cancer: An individual patient data pooled analysis of randomised clinical trials.
Raimondi, Alessandra; Nichetti, Federico; Stahler, Arndt; Wasan, Harpreet S; Aranda, Enrique; Randon, Giovanni; Kurreck, Annika; Meade, Angela M; Díaz-Rubio, Eduardo; Niger, Monica; Stintzing, Sebastian; Palermo, Federica; Trarbach, Tanja; Prisciandaro, Michele; Sommerhäuser, Greta; Fisher, David; Morano, Federica; Pietrantonio, Filippo; Modest, Dominik P.
Afiliación
  • Raimondi A; Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
  • Nichetti F; Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy; Computational Oncology Group, Molecular Precision Oncology Program, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Stahler A; Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Hematology, Oncology and Tumor Immunology, Berlin, Germany.
  • Wasan HS; Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College London, London, UK.
  • Aranda E; IMIBIC, Universidad de Córdoba, CIBERONC, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Hospital Universitario Reina Sofía, Córdoba, Spain.
  • Randon G; Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
  • Kurreck A; Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Hematology, Oncology and Tumor Immunology, Berlin, Germany.
  • Meade AM; MRC Clinical Trials Unit, University College London, Redhill, England, London, UK.
  • Díaz-Rubio E; Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Clinico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain.
  • Niger M; Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
  • Stintzing S; Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Hematology, Oncology and Tumor Immunology, Berlin, Germany.
  • Palermo F; Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
  • Trarbach T; Department of Medical Oncology, Reha-Zentrum am Meer, Bad Zwischenahn, Niedersachsen, Germany.
  • Prisciandaro M; Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
  • Sommerhäuser G; Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Hematology, Oncology and Tumor Immunology, Berlin, Germany.
  • Fisher D; MRC Clinical Trials Unit, University College London, Redhill, England, London, UK.
  • Morano F; Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
  • Pietrantonio F; Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy. Electronic address: filippo.pietrantonio@istitutotumori.mi.it.
  • Modest DP; Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Hematology, Oncology and Tumor Immunology, Berlin, Germany.
Eur J Cancer ; 190: 112945, 2023 09.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37441940
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Anti-EGFR antibodies plus doublet chemotherapy is the standard of care in RAS/BRAF wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). No phase-3 level of evidence is available to guide treatment de-escalation after anti-EGFR-based first-line. Several randomised clinical trials investigated de-intensification strategies with 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (5-FU/LV) and/or anti-EGFR.

METHODS:

We performed an individual patient data pooled analysis of Valentino, Panama, MACRO-2, COIN-B trials including RAS wild-type mCRC patients who received first-line therapy with FOLFOX plus panitumumab or cetuximab followed by pre-specified maintenance strategy. Only patients who started maintenance according to the assigned arm were included. Patients were categorised by type of maintenance (i.e. 5-FU/LV, anti-EGFR or 5-FU/LV + anti-EGFR). Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated from the start of maintenance; toxicity was evaluated for the maintenance treatment period.

RESULTS:

A total of 518 patients were included in the pooled analysis. Overall, 123, 185 and 210 patients received maintenance with 5-FU/LV, anti-EGFR, 5-FU/LV + anti-EGFR, respectively. Median PFS was 5.6, 6.0 and 9.0 (P = 0.009) and OS was 25.7, 24.0 and 28.0 months (P = 0.134) in 5-FU/LV, anti-EGFR and 5-FU/LV + anti-EGFR arms, respectively. Monotherapy maintenance (either 5-FU/LV or anti-EGFR) was inferior to combination in terms of PFS (hazard ratios [HR] 1.26, P = 0.016) and non-significantly trending also in OS (HR 1.20, P = 0.111). An increase of overall any grade and grade ≥ 3 AEs and selected AEs was reported in combination compared to either 5-FU/LV or anti-EGFR arms.

CONCLUSIONS:

This pooled analysis including four randomised phase II supports the use of 5-FU/LV plus anti-EGFR as the preferred maintenance regimen. Data provide rational for a more individualised maintenance treatment approach based on tumour and patients features.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias del Recto / Neoplasias Colorrectales / Neoplasias del Colon Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials Idioma: En Revista: Eur J Cancer Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias del Recto / Neoplasias Colorrectales / Neoplasias del Colon Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials Idioma: En Revista: Eur J Cancer Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article