Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A framework for assessing clinical trial site readiness.
Buse, John B; Austin, Christopher P; Johnston, S Claiborne; Lewis-Hall, Freda; March, Andrew N; Shore, Carolyn K; Tenaerts, Pamela; Rutter, Joni L.
Afiliación
  • Buse JB; Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
  • Austin CP; Flagship Pioneering, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Johnston SC; Harbor Health, Austin, TX, USA.
  • Lewis-Hall F; Retired from Pfizer Inc., USA.
  • March AN; National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.
  • Shore CK; National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.
  • Tenaerts P; Medable, Inc, USA.
  • Rutter JL; National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
J Clin Transl Sci ; 7(1): e151, 2023.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37456265
ABSTRACT
Clinical trial processes are unnecessarily inefficient and costly, slowing the translation of medical discoveries into treatments for people living with disease. To reduce redundancies and inefficiencies, a group of clinical trial experts developed a framework for clinical trial site readiness based on existing trial site qualifications from sponsors. The site readiness practices are encompassed within six domains research team, infrastructure, study management, data collection and management, quality oversight, and ethics and safety. Implementation of this framework for clinical trial sites would reduce inefficiencies in trial conduct and help prepare new sites to enter the clinical trials enterprise, with the potential to improve the reach of clinical trials to underserved communities. Moreover, the framework holds benefits for trial sponsors, contract research organizations, trade associations, trial participants, and the public. For novice sites considering future trials, we provide a framework for site preparation and the engagement of stakeholders. For experienced sites, the framework can be used to assess current practices and inform and engage sponsors, staff, and participants. Details in the supplementary materials provide easy access to key regulatory documents and resources. Invited perspective articles provide greater depth from a systems, DEIA (diversity, equity, inclusion, and accessibility) and decentralized trials perspective.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Clin Transl Sci Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Clin Transl Sci Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article