Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Outcome of Implant Diameter and Length on the Distribution of Stress with Immediate Loaded Implants: A 3D Finite Element Analysis.
Kavitha, G; Sonkesriya, Subhash; Kumar, K Anil; Almutairi, Faris Jaser; Parmar, Pravin M; Parihar, Anuj Singh; Sonkar, Tanu Priya.
Afiliación
  • Kavitha G; Department of Conservative Dentistry, Sharavathi Dental College and Hospital, Shivamogga, Karnataka, India.
  • Sonkesriya S; Department of Prosthodontics and crown and Bridge, Government College of Dentistry, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India.
  • Kumar KA; Department of Prosthodontics, Saraswti Dhanwantari Dental College and Hospital, Parbani, Maharastra, India.
  • Almutairi FJ; Assistant Professor, Separtment of Maxillofacial Surgery and Diagnostic Sciences, College of Dentistry, Qassim University, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
  • Parmar PM; Department of Prosthodontics Crown and Bridge, Dental Surgeon Class-1, General Hospital, Dist-Botad, India.
  • Parihar AS; Department of Periodontology, People's Dental Academy, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India.
  • Sonkar TP; Deportment of Prosthodontics Crown and Bridge, Rural Dental College, Loni, Maharastra, India.
J Pharm Bioallied Sci ; 15(Suppl 2): S1329-S1331, 2023 Jul.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37693959
Objectives: To assess the outcome of implant diameter and length on THE distribution of stress using a three-dimensional (3D) finite elements (FE) analysis, with immediate loading implants. Materials and Methods: This study made use of a 3D FE model of an implant encased in a chunk of bone. The LEADER/ITALIA-Fix type implant was created specifically for immediate loading. To create a solid model of the implant and bone and to carry out the FE analysis, the ANSYS V.12 programme was used. Results: The findings indicated that the neck of dental implants is the area of highest stress for all implant diameters and lengths, with an increase in implant length from 10 mm to 12 mm resulting in a slight raise in stress at the interface of implant-bone, and an increase in diameter from 3.75 mm to 4.25 mm having no appreciable impact on the value of stresses around dental implants. Conclusion: It was concluded that an increase in length has a negative effect on stress, while a diameter increase has no discernible impact on stress values.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: J Pharm Bioallied Sci Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: J Pharm Bioallied Sci Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article