Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Twelve Month Outcomes of Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgery in Patients With Uterovaginal or Posthysterectomy Vaginal Prolapse Enrolled in the Multicenter Pelvic Floor Disorders Registry.
Ferrando, Cecile A; Bradley, Catherine S; Meyn, Leslie A; Brown, Heidi W; Moalli, Pamela A; Heisler, Christine A; Murarka, Shivani M; Foster, Raymond T; Chung, Doreen E; Whitcomb, Emily L; Gutman, Robert E; Andy, Uduak U; Shippey, Stuart H; Anger, Jennifer; Yurteri-Kaplan, Ladin A.
Afiliación
  • Ferrando CA; From the Center for Urogynecology and Pelvic Reconstructive Surgery, Women's Health Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH.
  • Bradley CS; Division of Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA.
  • Meyn LA; Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Magee Womens Research Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
  • Brown HW; Division of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI.
  • Moalli PA; Division of Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Magee Womens Research Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
  • Heisler CA; Division of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI.
  • Murarka SM; Division of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.
  • Foster RT; Division of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Women's Health, University of Missouri School of Medicine, Columbia, MO.
  • Chung DE; Department of Urology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY.
  • Whitcomb EL; Division of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Southern California Permanente Medical Group, Irvine, CA.
  • Gutman RE; National Center for Advanced Pelvic Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, MedStar Washington Hospital Center/Georgetown University, Washington, DC.
  • Andy UU; Division of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
  • Shippey SH; Urogynecology Division, University of Florida Obstetrics and Gynecology Residency; Ascension Sacred Heart, Pensacola, FL.
  • Anger J; Departments of Urology and Obstetrics and Gynecology, UC San Diego Health, San Diego, CA.
  • Yurteri-Kaplan LA; Division of Gynecologic Specialty Surgery, Section of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology; Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY.
Urogynecology (Phila) ; 29(10): 787-799, 2023 10 01.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37733440
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

The aim of the study was to compare 12-month subjective and objective outcomes between 3 approaches to apical pelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgery in patients presenting with uterovaginal or posthysterectomy vaginal prolapse enrolled in the Pelvic Floor Disorders Registry for Research. STUDY

DESIGN:

This was an analysis of a multicenter, prospective registry that collected both patient- and physician-reported data for up to 3 years after conservative (pessary) and surgical treatment for POP. Twelve-month subjective and anatomic outcomes for patients who underwent surgical treatment were extracted from the registry for analysis. Pelvic organ prolapse recurrence was defined as a composite outcome and compared between the 3 apical surgery groups (native tissue repair, sacrocolpopexy, colpocleisis) as well as the 2 reconstructive surgery groups (native tissue repair and sacrocolpopexy).

RESULTS:

A total of 1,153 women were enrolled in the registry and 777 (67%) opted for surgical treatment, of whom 641 underwent apical repair and were included in this analysis (404 native tissue repair, 187 sacrocolpopexy, and 50 colpocleisis). The overall incidence of recurrence was as follows subjective 6.5%, anatomic 4.7%, retreatment 7.2%, and composite 13.6%. The incidence of recurrence was not different between the 3 surgical groups. When baseline patient characteristics were controlled for, composite POP recurrence between the native tissue and sacrocolpopexy groups remained statistically nonsignificant. Concurrent perineorrhaphy with any type of apical POP surgery was associated with a lower risk of recurrence (adjusted odds ratio, 0.43; 95% confidence interval, 0.25-0.74; P = 0.002) and prior hysterectomy was associated with a higher risk (adjusted odds ratio, 1.77, 95% confidence interval, 1.04-3.03; P = 0.036).

CONCLUSION:

Pelvic Floor Disorders Registry for Research participants undergoing native tissue apical POP repair, sacrocolpopexy, and colpocleisis surgery had similar rates of POP recurrence 12 months after surgery.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Prolapso Uterino / Prolapso de Órgano Pélvico / Trastornos del Suelo Pélvico Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials Idioma: En Revista: Urogynecology (Phila) Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Prolapso Uterino / Prolapso de Órgano Pélvico / Trastornos del Suelo Pélvico Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials Idioma: En Revista: Urogynecology (Phila) Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article