Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Survival of patients with clear cell renal carcinoma according to number and location of organ-specific metastatic sites.
Tappero, Stefano; Barletta, Francesco; Piccinelli, Mattia Luca; Cano Garcia, Cristina; Incesu, Reha-Baris; Morra, Simone; Scheipner, Lukas; Baudo, Andrea; Tian, Zhe; Parodi, Stefano; Dell'Oglio, Paolo; Briganti, Alberto; de Cobelli, Ottavio; Chun, Felix K H; Graefen, Markus; Longo, Nicola; Ahyai, Sascha; Carmignani, Luca; Saad, Fred; Shariat, Shahrokh F; Suardi, Nazareno; Borghesi, Marco; Terrone, Carlo; Karakiewicz, Pierre I.
Afiliación
  • Tappero S; Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Urology, IRCCS Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy; Department of Surgical and Diagnostic Integrated Sciences (DISC), University of Genova, Genova, Italy
  • Barletta F; Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University,
  • Piccinelli ML; Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
  • Cano Garcia C; Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt, Germany.
  • Incesu RB; Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
  • Morra S; Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy.
  • Scheipner L; Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Urology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
  • Baudo A; Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Urology, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Milan, Italy.
  • Tian Z; Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
  • Parodi S; Department of Urology, IRCCS Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy; Department of Surgical and Diagnostic Integrated Sciences (DISC), University of Genova, Genova, Italy.
  • Dell'Oglio P; Department of Urology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy; Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Radiology, Interventional Molecular Imaging Laboratory, Leiden University Medical Center, L
  • Briganti A; Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
  • de Cobelli O; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
  • Chun FKH; Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
  • Graefen M; Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt, Germany.
  • Longo N; Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
  • Ahyai S; Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy.
  • Carmignani L; Department of Urology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
  • Saad F; Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
  • Shariat SF; Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX; Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman
  • Suardi N; Department of Urology, Spedali Civili of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
  • Borghesi M; Department of Urology, IRCCS Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy; Department of Surgical and Diagnostic Integrated Sciences (DISC), University of Genova, Genova, Italy.
  • Terrone C; Department of Urology, IRCCS Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy; Department of Surgical and Diagnostic Integrated Sciences (DISC), University of Genova, Genova, Italy.
  • Karakiewicz PI; Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Urol Oncol ; 42(1): 22.e23-22.e31, 2024 01.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37775340
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The prognostic significance of number and location of organ-specific metastatic sites in treated metastatic clear cell renal carcinoma (ccmRCC) patients is object of debate. The current study aimed to test the association between number and location of organ-specific metastatic sites and overall survival (OS) in ccmRCC. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

Within Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database (2010-2018), all ccmRCC patients treated with cytoreductive nephrectomy and/or systemic therapy were identified. Kaplan-Meier plots and Cox regression models focused on A). number of organ-specific metastatic sites solitary vs. 2 vs. 3 or more; B). solitary organ-specific metastatic sites (lung vs. bone vs. liver vs. brain); C). combinations of 2 and 3 or more different organ-specific metastatic sites.

RESULTS:

Of 4,527 patients (median OS 19 months), 3,054 (67%) harbored solitary organ-specific metastatic sites (27 months) vs. 1,153 (25%) combinations of 2 different organ-specific metastatic sites (12 months) vs. 320 (8%) combinations of 3 or more different organ-specific metastatic sites (7 months). In patients with solitary organ-specific metastatic sites, bone metastases portended the longest median OS (median OS 31 months) vs. liver metastases portended the shortest median OS (16 months). Both were independent predictors of OS (multivariable hazard ratio, bone 0.87; liver 1.21). Median OS was similarly poor in patients with combinations of 2 different organ-specific metastatic sites (9-13 months), regardless of their location. The same pattern applied to patients with combinations of 3 or more different organ-specific metastatic sites (6-7 months).

CONCLUSIONS:

Solitary organ-specific metastatic sites portend the most favorable OS (16-31 months). Solitary bone metastases yield the longest vs. liver metastases the shortest OS. Invariably poor OS applies to combinations of 2 (9-13 months), as well as 3 or more different organ-specific metastatic sites (6-7 months), regardless of their location.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias Óseas / Carcinoma de Células Renales / Neoplasias Renales / Neoplasias Hepáticas Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Urol Oncol Asunto de la revista: NEOPLASIAS / UROLOGIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias Óseas / Carcinoma de Células Renales / Neoplasias Renales / Neoplasias Hepáticas Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Urol Oncol Asunto de la revista: NEOPLASIAS / UROLOGIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article