Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Diagnostic and Prognostic Role of Left Ventricular Strain Imaging in Adults with Coarctation of aorta.
Egbe, Alexander C; Miranda, William R; Ahmed, Marwan; Burchill, Luke J; Jain, C Charles; Karnakoti, Snigdha; Kandlakunta, Sriharsha; Connolly, Heidi M.
Afiliación
  • Egbe AC; Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, Minnesota. Electronic address: egbe.alexander@mayo.edu.
  • Miranda WR; Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, Minnesota.
  • Ahmed M; Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, Minnesota.
  • Burchill LJ; Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, Minnesota.
  • Jain CC; Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, Minnesota.
  • Karnakoti S; Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, Minnesota.
  • Kandlakunta S; Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, Minnesota.
  • Connolly HM; Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, Minnesota.
Am J Cardiol ; 211: 98-105, 2024 Jan 15.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37940012
The relative diagnostic and prognostic performance of left ventricular (LV) global longitudinal strain (LVGLS) compared with LV ejection fraction (LVEF) and the role of LVGLS for detecting the early stages of LV systolic dysfunction in adults with repaired coarctation of the aorta are unknown. This study aimed to address these knowledge gaps. We used a retrospective cohort study of adults with repaired coarctation of the aorta who underwent transthoracic echocardiogram (2003 to 2020). LV systolic function was assessed using LVEF (derived from volumetric analysis) and LVGLS (derived from speckle-tracking echocardiography). Of the 795 patients (age 36 ± 14 years), the mean LVEF and LVGLS were 62 ± 11% and 21 ± 4%, respectively. The prevalence of LV systolic dysfunction was higher when assessed using LVGLS than using LVEF (20% vs 6%, p <0.001). Of 795 patients, 94 (12%) patients died, of which 75 (9%) died from cardiovascular causes. LVGLS provided more robust prognostic power in predicting the all-cause mortality than LVEF, as evidenced by a higher C-statistic (0.743, 95% confidence interval 0.730 to 0.755 vs 0.782, 95% confidence interval 0.771 to 0.792, p <0.001). Furthermore, patients with normal LVEF in the setting of reduced LVGLS had a higher risk of all-cause mortality (than patients with normal LVGLS and LVEF) and were at risk for a temporal decrease in LVEF during follow-up. These findings suggest that the use of LVGLS for risk stratification can help identify high-risk patients and provide opportunities for interventions, which would, in turn, improve clinical outcomes. Further studies are required to empirically test these postulates.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Coartación Aórtica / Disfunción Ventricular Izquierda Idioma: En Revista: Am J Cardiol Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Coartación Aórtica / Disfunción Ventricular Izquierda Idioma: En Revista: Am J Cardiol Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article