Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A Randomized, Controlled Trial Comparing Tearcare® and Cyclosporine Ophthalmic Emulsion for the Treatment of Dry Eye Disease (SAHARA).
Ayres, Brandon D; Bloomenstein, Marc R; Loh, Jennifer; Chester, Thomas; Saenz, Bobby; Echegoyen, Julio; Kannarr, Shane R; Perez, Victor L; Rodriguez, Tomasita C; Dickerson, Jaime E.
Afiliación
  • Ayres BD; Private Practice, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
  • Bloomenstein MR; Schwartz Laser Eye Center, Scottsdale, AZ, USA.
  • Loh J; Loh Ophthalmology Associates, Miami, FL, USA.
  • Chester T; Cleveland Eye Clinic, Brecksville, OH, USA.
  • Saenz B; Rosenberg School of Optometry, University of the Incarnate Word, San Antonio, TX, USA.
  • Echegoyen J; LASIK San Antonio, Kerrville, TX, USA.
  • Kannarr SR; Gordon Schanzlin New Vision Institute, La Jolla, CA, USA.
  • Perez VL; Kannarr Eye Care, Pittsburg, KS, USA.
  • Rodriguez TC; Department of Ophthalmology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
  • Dickerson JE; Sight Sciences, Menlo Park, CA, USA.
Clin Ophthalmol ; 17: 3925-3940, 2023.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38143559
ABSTRACT

Purpose:

We compare outcomes in eyes with dry eye disease (DED) treated with TearCare (TC) or topical cyclosporine 0.05% (RESTASIS; CsA).

Setting:

Nineteen ophthalmic and optometric practices in 11 US states.

Design:

Multicenter, randomized, assessor-masked, controlled IRB-approved trial. Eligible

subjects:

≥22 years of age, dry eye symptoms within 3-6 months, Tear Break-up Time (TBUT) ≥1 to ≤7 s, Meibomian Gland Secretion Score (MGSS) ≤12, Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) of 23-79. Randomized (11) to TC or CsA. TC subjects treated at baseline and month 5; CsA was twice daily for 6 months.

Methods:

Follow-up visits were scheduled for Day 1, Week 1, Months 1, 3, and 6 with primary inference at Month 6. Primary

outcomes:

TBUT and OSDI; secondary

outcomes:

MGSS, conjunctival and corneal staining, eye dryness score (EDS), symptoms assessment in dry eye (SANDE) score, and Schirmer tear score (STS). Safety assessments included adverse events, best corrected visual acuity, intraocular pressure, and slit-lamp findings.

Results:

Overall, 345 subjects, 172 TC and 173 CsA. TBUT improved at all time points in both groups (p<0.0001), with statistically greater improvement for TC versus CsA (p=0.0006). OSDI improved significantly at all time points in both groups (p<0.0001) with no significant differences between treatments. MGSS and other measures of meibomian gland function improved significantly more with TC eyes versus CsA; other secondary outcomes showed significant improvements in both groups with no difference between groups. Treatment-related adverse events were uncommon (10 total, 8 in the CsA group consistent with prior CsA studies); most (9/10) mild.

Conclusion:

TC provides statistically superior and sustained improvement in TBUT and multiple measures of meibomian gland secretion, and non-inferior improvement in OSDI, corneal and conjunctival staining, SANDE, EDS, and STS versus CsA. TC should be a preferred treatment for DED associated with MGD.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Clin Ophthalmol Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Clin Ophthalmol Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article