Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
External validation of the QCovid 2 and 3 risk prediction algorithms for risk of COVID-19 hospitalisation and mortality in adults: a national cohort study in Scotland.
Kerr, Steven; Millington, Tristan; Rudan, Igor; McCowan, Colin; Tibble, Holly; Jeffrey, Karen; Fagbamigbe, Adeniyi Francis; Simpson, Colin R; Robertson, Chris; Hippisley-Cox, Julia; Sheikh, Aziz.
Afiliación
  • Kerr S; Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
  • Millington T; Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
  • Rudan I; Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
  • McCowan C; School of Medicine, University of St. Andrews, St Andrews, UK.
  • Tibble H; Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
  • Jeffrey K; Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
  • Fagbamigbe AF; Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
  • Simpson CR; Department of Epidemiology and Medical Statistics, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria.
  • Robertson C; Faculty of Health, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand.
  • Hippisley-Cox J; Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK.
  • Sheikh A; Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
BMJ Open ; 13(12): e075958, 2023 12 27.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38151278
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

The QCovid 2 and 3 algorithms are risk prediction tools developed during the second wave of the COVID-19 pandemic that can be used to predict the risk of COVID-19 hospitalisation and mortality, taking vaccination status into account. In this study, we assess their performance in Scotland.

METHODS:

We used the Early Pandemic Evaluation and Enhanced Surveillance of COVID-19 national data platform consisting of individual-level data for the population of Scotland (5.4 million residents). Primary care data were linked to reverse-transcription PCR virology testing, hospitalisation and mortality data. We assessed the discrimination and calibration of the QCovid 2 and 3 algorithms in predicting COVID-19 hospitalisations and deaths between 8 December 2020 and 15 June 2021.

RESULTS:

Our validation dataset comprised 465 058 individuals, aged 19-100. We found the following performance metrics (95% CIs) for QCovid 2 and 3 Harrell's C 0.84 (0.82 to 0.86) for hospitalisation, and 0.92 (0.90 to 0.94) for death, observed-expected ratio of 0.24 for hospitalisation and 0.26 for death (ie, both the number of hospitalisations and the number of deaths were overestimated), and a Brier score of 0.0009 (0.00084 to 0.00096) for hospitalisation and 0.00036 (0.00032 to 0.0004) for death.

CONCLUSIONS:

We found good discrimination of the QCovid 2 and 3 algorithms in Scotland, although performance was worse in higher age groups. Both the number of hospitalisations and the number of deaths were overestimated.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: COVID-19 País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: BMJ Open Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: COVID-19 País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: BMJ Open Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article