Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mixing energy as an adjustment tool for aerodynamic behaviour of an inhaled product: In-vitro and in-vivo effects.
Thalberg, Kyrre; Matilainen, Laura; Heinonen, Elina; Eriksson, Patrik; Husman-Piirainen, Johanna; Autio, Maiju; Lyberg, Ann-Marie; Göransson, Stefan; Kirjavainen, Merja; Lähelmä, Satu.
Afiliación
  • Thalberg K; Dept of Food Technology, Engineering and Nutrition, Lund University, Lund, Sweden; Emmace Consulting AB, Lund, Sweden. Electronic address: Kyrre@emmace.se.
  • Matilainen L; R&D, Orion Corporation, Espoo, Finland.
  • Heinonen E; R&D, Orion Corporation, Espoo, Finland.
  • Eriksson P; R&D, Orion Corporation, Espoo, Finland.
  • Husman-Piirainen J; R&D, Orion Corporation, Espoo, Finland.
  • Autio M; R&D, Orion Corporation, Espoo, Finland.
  • Lyberg AM; R&D, Galenica AB, Malmö, Sweden.
  • Göransson S; R&D, Galenica AB, Malmö, Sweden.
  • Kirjavainen M; R&D, Orion Corporation, Espoo, Finland.
  • Lähelmä S; R&D, Orion Corporation, Espoo, Finland. Electronic address: Satu.Lahelma@orionpharma.com.
Int J Pharm ; 651: 123755, 2024 Feb 15.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38163524
ABSTRACT
This paper describes the development of a fixed dose dry powder combination of indacaterol maleate (Inda) and glycopyrronium bromide (Glyco) in Easyhaler® inhaler for a comparative pharmacokinetic (PK) study, as well as the outcome of such a study. The development aim was to produce formulations with three different in vitro dispersibility profiles for both Inda and Glyco. This so-called 'rake' approach allows for quantitation of the candidate formulations relative to the reference product Ultibro® Breezhaler® in terms of the key PK parameters. Three formulations (A, B and C) were produced based on the mixing energy concept. For both APIs, formulation A (lowest mixing energy) displayed the highest fine particle fractions and formulation C (highest mixing energy) the lowest. GMP manufacturing confirmed the performance of the three formulations. The candidate formulations were tested against the reference product in a single dose PK study in healthy volunteers. Clear differences in Inda plasma concentration profiles were observed between the treatments when administered concomitantly with charcoal, with Easyhaler A showing the highest Cmax value and Easyhaler C the lowest. Easyhaler B was bioequivalent to Ultibro Breezhaler with regard to the primary PK parameters of Inda, Cmax and AUC72h. For Glyco, Easyhaler formulations A, B and C provided lower peak concentrations than Ultibro Breezhaler. For AUC72h of Glyco, Easyhaler B was bioequivalent to the reference product. Additional measures for adjustment of formulation performance can be foreseen, whose effects can be predicted based on mixing energy theory.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Nebulizadores y Vaporizadores / Inhaladores de Polvo Seco Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Int J Pharm Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Nebulizadores y Vaporizadores / Inhaladores de Polvo Seco Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Int J Pharm Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article