Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Patient Decision Aids for Breast Cancer Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Su, Yunjhen; Sun, Chin-Yu; Chiu, Wen-Kuan; Kang, Yi-No; Chen, Chiehfeng.
Afiliación
  • Su Y; School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
  • Sun CY; Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
  • Chiu WK; Department of Computer Science and Information Engineering, National Taipei University of Technology, Taipei, Taiwan.
  • Kang YN; Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
  • Chen C; Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Plast Reconstr Surg ; 2024 Jan 15.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38232225
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Breast cancer has surpassed lung cancer to become the most frequently diagnosed cancer in women. There has been a dramatic increase in the use of breast reconstruction after mastectomy. However, struggle in making decisions regarding breast reconstruction has existed. Thus, decision aid (DA) is necessary to be conducted, and further studies are needed to promote better decision aid. This review discussed how DAs can be used to help women make decisions about breast reconstruction after mastectomy. Additionally, the review was the first to compare different DA formats to determine which one is most effective.

METHODS:

We searched for relevant studies published before October 2022 in PubMed and Embase using the medical subject headings "breast reconstruction" and "decision aid." Demographic data as well as decision, outcomes and instruments used for assessment were also collected. Risk of bias was measured by the Cochrane Risk-of-Bias 2 (RoB 2) tool.

RESULTS:

A network meta-analysis of 14 RCTs with a total of 1401 patients wereincluded. 90.9% participants presented usable results for evaluation of decisional conflict, and web-based DA (-0.3, 95% CI -0.56 to -0.05) showed significant improvement. 50.3% participants provided results of decisional regret, and no subgroups showed significant reduction. 60.3% participants contributed to results for knowledge, and web-based DA (0.61, 95% CI 0.01 to 1.21) showed the most positive effect. 44.5% participants were included for evaluation of satisfaction, and web-based DA (0.44, 95% CI 0.15 to 0.72) revealed significant increase.

CONCLUSION:

The review concluded that web-based decision aids are the favorable format of decision aid.

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Revista: Plast Reconstr Surg Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Revista: Plast Reconstr Surg Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article