Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Safety of limb lengthening after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: an analysis of the MBSAQIP database.
Dang, Jerry T; Hider, Ahmad M; Barajas-Gamboa, Juan S; Mocanu, Valentin; Shin, Thomas; Romero-Velez, Gustavo; Lee, Yung; Navarrete, Salvador; Rodriguez, John; Kroh, Matthew.
Afiliación
  • Dang JT; Digestive Disease Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio. Electronic address: dangj3@ccf.org.
  • Hider AM; Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
  • Barajas-Gamboa JS; Digestive Diseases Institute, Cleveland Clinic Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.
  • Mocanu V; Department of Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
  • Shin T; Digestive Disease Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
  • Romero-Velez G; Digestive Disease Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
  • Lee Y; Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
  • Navarrete S; Digestive Disease Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
  • Rodriguez J; Digestive Diseases Institute, Cleveland Clinic Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.
  • Kroh M; Digestive Disease Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
Surg Obes Relat Dis ; 20(6): 564-570, 2024 Jun.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38316579
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) effectively treats severe obesity, but some patients may require revisional surgery like limb lengthening (LL) for postoperative weight gain.

OBJECTIVES:

This study aims to compare 30-day serious complications and mortality rates between LL and primary RYGB, given limited safety data on LL.

METHODS:

Patients who underwent LL and RYGB were identified from the 2020 and 2021 MBSAQIP databases, the only years in which LL data were available. Baseline characteristics and 30-day rates of serious complications and mortality were analyzed.

RESULTS:

A total of 86,990 patients underwent RYGB and 455 underwent LL. Patients undergoing RYGB were younger (44.4 versus 49.8 yr, P < .001), had a higher body mass index (BMI) (45.5 versus 41.8 kg/m2, P < .001) and higher rates of comorbidities including diabetes (30.0 versus 13.6%, P < .001). RYGB and LL had similar operative duration (125.3 versus 123.2 min, P = .5). There were no statistical differences between cohorts for length of stay (LOS) (1.6 RYGB versus 1.6 LL d, P = .6). After LL, there were higher 30-day rates of reoperation (3.3 versus 1.9%, P = .03) and deep surgical site infections (1.3 versus .5%, P = .03) compared to RYGB. There were no differences in overall serious complications (5.1 LL versus 5.0% RYGB, P = 1.0) and mortality (.2 LL versus .1% RYGB, P = .5). Multivariable logistic regression adjustment found that previous venous thromboembolism was associated with serious complications after LL.

CONCLUSIONS:

When compared to primary RYGB, LL has a favorable safety profile with similar 30-day rates of serious complications and mortality.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Complicaciones Posoperatorias / Reoperación / Obesidad Mórbida / Derivación Gástrica Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Surg Obes Relat Dis Asunto de la revista: METABOLISMO Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Complicaciones Posoperatorias / Reoperación / Obesidad Mórbida / Derivación Gástrica Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Surg Obes Relat Dis Asunto de la revista: METABOLISMO Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article