Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Development and Validation of a Method of Body Volume and Fat Mass Estimation Using Three-Dimensional Image Processing with a Mexican Sample.
García Flores, Fabián Ituriel; Klünder Klünder, Miguel; López Teros, Miriam Teresa; Muñoz Ibañez, Cristopher Antonio; Padilla Castañeda, Miguel Angel.
Afiliación
  • García Flores FI; School of Medicine, National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM), Mexico City 04510, Mexico.
  • Klünder Klünder M; Research Subdirectorate, Children's Hospital of Mexico Federico Gómez, Dr. Marquez St. 162, Colonia Doctores, Mexico City 06720, Mexico.
  • López Teros MT; Health Department, Santa Fe Campus, Iberoamerican University, Prol. Paseo de la Reforma, Zedec Sta Fé, Álvaro Obregón, Mexico City 01219, Mexico.
  • Muñoz Ibañez CA; Institute of Advanced Materials for Sustainable Manufacturing, Tecnológico de Monterrey, Canal de Miramontes, Tlalpan, Mexico City 14380, Mexico.
  • Padilla Castañeda MA; Applied Science and Technology Institute (ICAT), National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM), Mexico City 04510, Mexico.
Nutrients ; 16(3)2024 Jan 29.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38337669
ABSTRACT
Body composition assessment using instruments such as dual X-ray densitometry (DXA) can be complex and their use is often limited to research. This cross-sectional study aimed to develop and validate a densitometric method for fat mass (FM) estimation using 3D cameras. Using two such cameras, stereographic images, and a mesh reconstruction algorithm, 3D models were obtained. The FM estimations were compared using DXA as a reference. In total, 28 adults, with a mean BMI of 24.5 (±3.7) kg/m2 and mean FM (by DXA) of 19.6 (±5.8) kg, were enrolled. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for body volume (BV) was 0.98-0.99 (95% CI, 0.97-0.99) for intra-observer and 0.98 (95% CI, 0.96-0.99) for inter-observer reliability. The coefficient of variation for kinetic BV was 0.20 and the mean difference (bias) for BV (liter) between Bod Pod and Kinect was 0.16 (95% CI, -1.2 to 1.6), while the limits of agreement (LoA) were 7.1 to -7.5 L. The mean bias for FM (kg) between DXA and Kinect was -0.29 (95% CI, -2.7 to 2.1), and the LoA was 12.1 to -12.7 kg. The adjusted R2 obtained using an FM regression model was 0.86. The measurements of this 3D camera-based system aligned with the reference measurements, showing the system's feasibility as a simpler, more economical screening tool than current systems.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Composición Corporal / Imagenología Tridimensional Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies País/Región como asunto: Mexico Idioma: En Revista: Nutrients Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Composición Corporal / Imagenología Tridimensional Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies País/Región como asunto: Mexico Idioma: En Revista: Nutrients Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article