Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Common practices for sociodemographic data reporting in digital mental health intervention research: a scoping review.
Kirvin-Quamme, Andrew; Kissinger, Jennifer; Quinlan, Laurel; Montgomery, Robert; Chernenok, Mariya; Pirner, Maddison C; Pajarito, Sarah; Rapoport, Stephanie; Wicks, Paul; Darcy, Alison; Greene, Carolyn J; Robinson, Athena.
Afiliación
  • Kirvin-Quamme A; Woebot Health, San Francisco, California, USA.
  • Kissinger J; Woebot Health, San Francisco, California, USA.
  • Quinlan L; Woebot Health, San Francisco, California, USA.
  • Montgomery R; Woebot Health, San Francisco, California, USA.
  • Chernenok M; Woebot Health, San Francisco, California, USA.
  • Pirner MC; Woebot Health, San Francisco, California, USA.
  • Pajarito S; Woebot Health, San Francisco, California, USA.
  • Rapoport S; Woebot Health, San Francisco, California, USA.
  • Wicks P; Wicks Digital Health, Ltd, Lichfield, UK.
  • Darcy A; Woebot Health, San Francisco, California, USA.
  • Greene CJ; Translational Research Institute (TRI), University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA.
  • Robinson A; Woebot Health, San Francisco, California, USA athena@woebothealth.com.
BMJ Open ; 14(2): e078029, 2024 Feb 12.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38346876
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The ability of digital mental health interventions (DMHIs) to reduce mental health disparities relies on the recruitment of research participants with diverse sociodemographic and self-identity characteristics. Despite its importance, sociodemographic reporting in research is often limited, and the state of reporting practices in DMHI research in particular has not been comprehensively reviewed.

OBJECTIVES:

To characterise the state of sociodemographic data reported in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of app-based DMHIs published globally from 2007 to 2022.

METHODS:

A scoping review of RCTs of app-based DMHIs examined reporting frequency for 16 sociodemographic domains (eg, gender) and common category options within each domain (eg, woman). The search queried five electronic databases. 5079 records were screened and 299 articles were included.

RESULTS:

On average, studies reported 4.64 (SD=1.79; range 0-9) of 16 sociodemographic domains. The most common were age (97%) and education (67%). The least common were housing situation (6%), residency/location (5%), veteran status (4%), number of children (3%), sexual orientation (2%), disability status (2%) and food security (<1%). Gender or sex was reported in 98% of studies gender only (51%), sex only (28%), both (<1%) and gender/sex reported but unspecified (18%). Race or ethnicity was reported in 48% of studies race only (14%), ethnicity only (14%), both (10%) and race/ethnicity reported but unspecified (10%).

CONCLUSIONS:

This review describes the widespread underreporting of sociodemographic information in RCTs of app-based DMHIs published from 2007 to 2022. Reporting was often incomplete (eg, % female only), unclear (eg, the conflation of gender/sex) and limited (eg, only options representing majority groups were reported). Trends suggest reporting has somewhat improved in recent years. Diverse participant populations must be welcomed and described in DMHI research to broaden learning and the generalisability of results, a prerequisite of DMHI's potential to reduce disparities in mental healthcare.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Proyectos de Investigación / Salud Mental Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Revista: BMJ Open Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Proyectos de Investigación / Salud Mental Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Revista: BMJ Open Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article