Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Automated Real-Time Detection of Lung Sliding Using Artificial Intelligence: A Prospective Diagnostic Accuracy Study.
Clausdorff Fiedler, Hans; Prager, Ross; Smith, Delaney; Wu, Derek; Dave, Chintan; Tschirhart, Jared; Wu, Ben; Van Berlo, Blake; Malthaner, Richard; Arntfield, Robert.
Afiliación
  • Clausdorff Fiedler H; Sección de Medicina de Urgencia, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile. Electronic address: hjclausd@uc.cl.
  • Prager R; Division of Critical Care Medicine, Western University, London, ON, Canada.
  • Smith D; Lawson Health Research Institute, London, ON, Canada.
  • Wu D; Lawson Health Research Institute, London, ON, Canada.
  • Dave C; Lawson Health Research Institute, London, ON, Canada.
  • Tschirhart J; Lawson Health Research Institute, London, ON, Canada.
  • Wu B; Lawson Health Research Institute, London, ON, Canada.
  • Van Berlo B; Faculty of Mathematics, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada.
  • Malthaner R; Division of Thoracic Surgery, Western University, London, ON, Canada.
  • Arntfield R; Division of Critical Care Medicine, Western University, London, ON, Canada.
Chest ; 2024 Feb 15.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38365174
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Rapid evaluation for pneumothorax is a common clinical priority. Although lung ultrasound (LUS) often is used to assess for pneumothorax, its diagnostic accuracy varies based on patient and provider factors. To enhance the performance of LUS for pulmonary pathologic features, artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted imaging has been adopted; however, the diagnostic accuracy of AI-assisted LUS (AI-LUS) deployed in real time to diagnose pneumothorax remains unknown. RESEARCH QUESTION In patients with suspected pneumothorax, what is the real-time diagnostic accuracy of AI-LUS to recognize the absence of lung sliding? STUDY DESIGN AND

METHODS:

We performed a prospective AI-assisted diagnostic accuracy study of AI-LUS to recognize the absence of lung sliding in a convenience sample of patients with suspected pneumothorax. After calibrating the model parameters and imaging settings for bedside deployment, we prospectively evaluated its diagnostic accuracy for lung sliding compared with a reference standard of expert consensus.

RESULTS:

Two hundred forty-one lung sliding evaluations were derived from 62 patients. AI-LUS showed a sensitivity of 0.921 (95% CI, 0.792-0.973), specificity of 0.802 (95% CI, 0.735-0.856), area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.885 (95% CI, 0.828-0.956), and accuracy of 0.824 (95% CI, 0.766-0.870) for the diagnosis of absent lung sliding.

INTERPRETATION:

In this study, real-time AI-LUS showed high sensitivity and moderate specificity to identify the absence of lung sliding. Further research to improve model performance and optimize the integration of AI-LUS into existing diagnostic pathways is warranted.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Chest Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Chest Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article