Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Cofactors of Partner HIV Self-testing and Oral PrEP Acceptance Among Pregnant Women at High Risk of HIV in Kenya.
Ngumbau, Nancy M; Neary, Jillian; Wagner, Anjuli D; Abuna, Felix; Ochieng, Ben; Dettinger, Julia C; Gómez, Laurén; Marwa, Mary M; Watoyi, Salphine; Nzove, Emmaculate; Pintye, Jillian; Baeten, Jared M; Kinuthia, John; John-Stewart, Grace.
Afiliación
  • Ngumbau NM; Research & Programs, Kenyatta National Hospital, Nairobi, Kenya.
  • Neary J; Department of Epidemiology.
  • Wagner AD; Department of Global Health.
  • Abuna F; Research & Programs, Kenyatta National Hospital, Nairobi, Kenya.
  • Ochieng B; Research & Programs, Kenyatta National Hospital, Nairobi, Kenya.
  • Dettinger JC; Department of Global Health.
  • Gómez L; Department of Epidemiology.
  • Marwa MM; Research & Programs, Kenyatta National Hospital, Nairobi, Kenya.
  • Watoyi S; Research & Programs, Kenyatta National Hospital, Nairobi, Kenya.
  • Nzove E; Research & Programs, Kenyatta National Hospital, Nairobi, Kenya.
  • Pintye J; Biobehavioral Nursing & Health Informatics.
  • Baeten JM; Department of Medicine; and.
  • Kinuthia J; Research & Programs, Kenyatta National Hospital, Nairobi, Kenya.
  • John-Stewart G; Department of Epidemiology.
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr ; 95(3): 238-245, 2024 03 01.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38408215
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Oral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) and male partner HIV self-testing (HIVST) is being scaled up within antenatal clinics. Few data are available on how co-distribution influences acceptance of both interventions.

METHODS:

We used data from the PrEP Implementation of Mothers in Antenatal Care (NCT03070600) trial in Kenya. Women included in this analysis were determined to be at high risk of HIV and offered oral PrEP and partner HIVST. Characteristics were compared between women who chose (1) PrEP and HIVST, (2) HIVST-alone, (3) PrEP-alone, or (4) declined both (reference), excluding women who had partners known to be living with HIV.

RESULTS:

Among 911 women, median age was 24 years, 87.3% were married, 43.9% perceived themselves to be at high risk of HIV and 13.0% had history of intimate partner violence (IPV). Overall, 68.9% accepted HIVST and 18.4% accepted PrEP, with 54.7% accepting HIVST-alone, 4.2% PrEP-alone, and 14.3% both HIVST and PrEP. Of women accepting HIVST, partner HIV testing increased from 20% to 82% and awareness of partner HIV status increased from 4.7% to 82.0% between pregnancy and 9 months postpartum (P < 0.001). Compared with women who accepted neither, choosing (1) HIVST-alone was associated with being married, higher level of education, and residing with partner; (2) PrEP-alone was associated with lower social support, IPV, not residing with partner, longer time living with partner, and suspicion of other partners; and (3) PrEP and HIVST was associated with being married, IPV, and suspicion that partner had other partners.

CONCLUSIONS:

Understanding factors associated with accepting HIVST and PrEP can inform HIV prevention programs for pregnant women. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER NCT03070600.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Infecciones por VIH / Profilaxis Pre-Exposición País/Región como asunto: Africa Idioma: En Revista: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Asunto de la revista: SINDROME DA IMUNODEFICIENCIA ADQUIRIDA (AIDS) Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Infecciones por VIH / Profilaxis Pre-Exposición País/Región como asunto: Africa Idioma: En Revista: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Asunto de la revista: SINDROME DA IMUNODEFICIENCIA ADQUIRIDA (AIDS) Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article