Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Machine-learning algorithms in screening for type 2 diabetes mellitus: Data from Fasa Adults Cohort Study.
Karmand, Hanieh; Andishgar, Aref; Tabrizi, Reza; Sadeghi, Alireza; Pezeshki, Babak; Ravankhah, Mahdi; Taherifard, Erfan; Ahmadizar, Fariba.
Afiliación
  • Karmand H; Student Research Committee, School of Medicine, Fasa University of Medical Sciences, Fasa, Iran.
  • Andishgar A; USERN Office, Fasa University of Medical Sciences, Fasa, Iran.
  • Tabrizi R; Noncommunicable Diseases Research Center, Fasa University of Medical Science, Fasa, Iran.
  • Sadeghi A; Student Research Committee, School of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
  • Pezeshki B; Health Policy Research Center, School of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
  • Ravankhah M; Clinical Research Development Unit, Valiasr Hospital, Fasa University of Medical Sciences, Fasa, Iran.
  • Taherifard E; Student Research Committee, School of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
  • Ahmadizar F; Student Research Committee, School of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Endocrinol Diabetes Metab ; 7(2): e00472, 2024 Mar.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38411386
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

The application of machine learning (ML) is increasingly growing in biomedical sciences. This study aimed to evaluate factors associated with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and compare the performance of ML methods in identifying individuals with the disease in an Iranian setting.

METHODS:

Using the baseline data from Fasa Adult Cohort Study (FACS) and in a sex-stratified manner, we studied factors associated with T2DM by applying seven different ML methods including Logistic Regression (LR), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Random Forest (RF), K-Nearest Neighbours (KNN), Gradient Boosting Machine (GBM), Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGB) and Bagging classifier (BAG). We further compared the performance of these methods; for each algorithm, accuracy, precision, sensitivity, specificity, F1 score, and Area Under Curve (AUC) were calculated.

RESULTS:

10,112 participants were recruited between 2014 and 2016, of whom 1246 had T2DM at baseline. 4566 (45%) participants were males, aged between 35 and 70 years. For males, age, sugar consumption, and history of hospitalization were the most weighted variables regarding their importance in screening for T2DM using the GBM model, respectively; these variables were sugar consumption, urine blood, and age for females. GBM outperformed other models for both males and females with AUC of 0.75 (0.69-0.82) and 0.76 (0.71-0.80), and F1 score of 0.33 (0.27-0.39) and 0.42 (0.38-0.46), respectively. GBM also showed a sensitivity of 0.24 (0.19-0.29) and a specificity of 0.98 (0.96-1.0) in males and a sensitivity of 0.38 (0.34-0.42) and specificity of 0.92 (0.89-0.95) in females. Notably, close performance characteristics were detected among other ML models.

CONCLUSIONS:

GBM model might achieve better performance in screening for T2DM in a south Iranian population.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 País/Región como asunto: Asia Idioma: En Revista: Endocrinol Diabetes Metab Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 País/Región como asunto: Asia Idioma: En Revista: Endocrinol Diabetes Metab Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article