Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Recommendations for accelerating open preprint peer review to improve the culture of science.
Avissar-Whiting, Michele; Belliard, Frédérique; Bertozzi, Stefano M; Brand, Amy; Brown, Katherine; Clément-Stoneham, Géraldine; Dawson, Stephanie; Dey, Gautam; Ecer, Daniel; Edmunds, Scott C; Farley, Ashley; Fischer, Tara D; Franko, Maryrose; Fraser, James S; Funk, Kathryn; Ganier, Clarisse; Harrison, Melissa; Hatch, Anna; Hazlett, Haley; Hindle, Samantha; Hook, Daniel W; Hurst, Phil; Kamoun, Sophien; Kiley, Robert; Lacy, Michael M; LaFlamme, Marcel; Lawrence, Rebecca; Lemberger, Thomas; Leptin, Maria; Lumb, Elliott; MacCallum, Catriona J; Marcum, Christopher Steven; Marinello, Gabriele; Mendonça, Alex; Monaco, Sara; Neves, Kleber; Pattinson, Damian; Polka, Jessica K; Puebla, Iratxe; Rittman, Martyn; Royle, Stephen J; Saderi, Daniela; Sever, Richard; Shearer, Kathleen; Spiro, John E; Stern, Bodo; Taraborelli, Dario; Vale, Ron; Vasquez, Claudia G; Waltman, Ludo.
Afiliación
  • Avissar-Whiting M; Office of the President, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Chevy Chase, Maryland, United States of America.
  • Belliard F; TU Delft OPEN Publishing, Delft University of Technology-TU Delft Library, Delft, the Netherlands.
  • Bertozzi SM; Department of Public Health, UC Berkeley School of Public Health, Berkeley, California, United States of America.
  • Brand A; The MIT Press, MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America.
  • Brown K; Development, The Company of Biologists, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
  • Clément-Stoneham G; Medical Research Council-UKRI, London, United Kingdom.
  • Dawson S; ScienceOpen GmbH, ScienceOpen, Berlin, Germany.
  • Dey G; Cell Biology and Biophysics, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Ecer D; Technology, Sciety/eLife, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
  • Edmunds SC; GigaScience Press, GigaScience Press, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR.
  • Farley A; Knowledge & Research Services, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
  • Fischer TD; Biochemistry Section, Surgical Neurology Branch, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America.
  • Franko M; Health Research Alliance, Swanton, Vermont, United States of America.
  • Fraser JS; Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences, University of California San Francisco & ASAPbio, San Francisco, California, United States of America.
  • Funk K; National Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America.
  • Ganier C; Centre for Gene Therapy and Regenerative Medicine, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
  • Harrison M; Literature Services, EMBL-EBI, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
  • Hatch A; Office of the President, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Chevy Chase, Maryland, United States of America.
  • Hazlett H; The San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment, Rockville, Maryland, United States of America.
  • Hindle S; PREreview, Portland, Oregon, United States of America.
  • Hook DW; Digital Science, London, United Kingdom.
  • Hurst P; Publishing Section, The Royal Society, London, United Kingdom.
  • Kamoun S; The Sainsbury Laboratory, Norwich, United Kingdom.
  • Kiley R; cOAlition S, Guildford, United Kingdom.
  • Lacy MM; The American Society for Cell Biology, Rockville, Maryland, United States of America.
  • LaFlamme M; Open Research, PLOS, San Francisco, California, United States of America.
  • Lawrence R; F1000, London, United Kingdom.
  • Lemberger T; Open Science Implementation, EMBO, Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Leptin M; President's Office, European Research Council, Brussels, Belgium.
  • Lumb E; PeerRef, Pontefract, United Kingdom.
  • MacCallum CJ; Open Science, Hindawi, London, United Kingdom.
  • Marcum CS; Unaffiliated, Washington, DC, United States of America.
  • Marinello G; Qeios, London, United Kingdom.
  • Mendonça A; SciELO Preprints, SciELO, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Monaco S; Review Commons, EMBO, Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Neves K; Science Program, Instituto Serrapilheira, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
  • Pattinson D; eLife, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
  • Polka JK; ASAPbio, Somerville, Massachusetts, United States of America.
  • Puebla I; DataCite, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
  • Rittman M; Crossref, Oxford, United Kingdom.
  • Royle SJ; Biomedical Sciences, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom.
  • Saderi D; PREreview, Portland, Oregon, United States of America.
  • Sever R; Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, New York, New York, United States of America.
  • Shearer K; COAR (Confederation of Open Access Repositories), Göttingen, Germany.
  • Spiro JE; Simons Foundation, New York, New York, United States of America.
  • Stern B; Office of the President, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Chevy Chase, Maryland, United States of America.
  • Taraborelli D; Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, Redwood City, California, United States of America.
  • Vale R; Janelia Research Campus, HHMI, Ashburn, Virginia, United States of America.
  • Vasquez CG; Biochemistry Department, University of Washington, Seattle, United States of America.
  • Waltman L; Centre for Science and Technology Studies (CWTS), Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands.
PLoS Biol ; 22(2): e3002502, 2024 Feb.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38421949
ABSTRACT
Peer review is an important part of the scientific process, but traditional peer review at journals is coming under increased scrutiny for its inefficiency and lack of transparency. As preprints become more widely used and accepted, they raise the possibility of rethinking the peer-review process. Preprints are enabling new forms of peer review that have the potential to be more thorough, inclusive, and collegial than traditional journal peer review, and to thus fundamentally shift the culture of peer review toward constructive collaboration. In this Consensus View, we make a call to action to stakeholders in the community to accelerate the growing momentum of preprint sharing and provide recommendations to empower researchers to provide open and constructive peer review for preprints.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Revisión por Pares / Investigadores Idioma: En Revista: PLoS Biol Asunto de la revista: BIOLOGIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Revisión por Pares / Investigadores Idioma: En Revista: PLoS Biol Asunto de la revista: BIOLOGIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article