Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Impact of the time of initiation and line of biologic therapy on the retention rate of secukinumab in axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA): data from the French multicentre retrospective FORSYA study.
Dougados, Maxime; Lardy-Cléaud, Audrey; Desfleurs, Emilie; Claudepierre, Pascal; Goupille, Philippe; Ryussen-Witrand, Adeline; Saraux, Alain; Tournadre, Anne; Wendling, Daniel; Lukas, Cédric.
Afiliación
  • Dougados M; Hopital Cochin, Rheumatology, Université Paris Descartes Faculté de Médecine, Paris, France maxime.dougados@aphp.fr.
  • Lardy-Cléaud A; Biostatistics RCTs Clinical Research Organization, Lyon, France.
  • Desfleurs E; Novartis Pharma France, Rueil Malmaison, France.
  • Claudepierre P; Rheumatology, Hôpital Henri Mondor, Créteil, France.
  • Goupille P; EA EpidermE, Université Paris Est Créteil, Créteil, France.
  • Ryussen-Witrand A; Rheumatology, CHU Tours, TOURS, France.
  • Saraux A; Rheumatology, CHU Purpan, Toulouse, France.
  • Tournadre A; UMR1027, INSERM/UPS Toulouse III, Toulouse, France.
  • Wendling D; Université de Bretagne Occidentale (Univ Brest), Brest, France.
  • Lukas C; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
RMD Open ; 10(1)2024 Feb 29.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38428974
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To compare the 1-year retention rate of secukinumab in axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) and its predisposing factors with regard to its time of initiation (eg, right after or remotely from its launch).

METHODS:

Study

design:

Retrospective multicentre French study of patients with axSpA. Study periods Two cohorts were evaluated regarding the time of initiation of secukinumab cohort 1 (C1)-between 16 August 2016 and 31 August 2018-and cohort 2 (C2)-between 1 September 2018 and 13 November 2020. STATISTICAL

ANALYSIS:

The 1-year retention rate of secukinumab was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and the log-rank test was used to compare the retention curves of the two cohorts. Preselected factors (eg, disease characterristics, line and time of secukinumab initiation) of secukinumab retention at 1 year were analysed by univariate and multivariate Cox model regression.

RESULTS:

In total, 906 patients in C1 and 758 in C2 from 50 centres were included in the analysis. The 1-year retention rate was better in C2 (64% (61%-68%)) vs C1 (59% (55%-62%)) (HR=1.19 (1.02-1.39); p=0.0297). In the multivariate analysis, the line of biologic therapy was the single predictive factor of the 1-year retention rate of secukinumab picked up in both cohorts, with a better retention rate when prescribed as first-line biologic therapy.

CONCLUSION:

The better secukinumab retention rate remotely from its launch is explained by its use at an earlier stage of the disease, suggesting a change in the behaviour of prescribing physicians. Our results emphasise the relevance of iterative evaluations of routine care treatments.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Espondilitis Anquilosante / Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados / Espondiloartritis Axial Idioma: En Revista: RMD Open Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Espondilitis Anquilosante / Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados / Espondiloartritis Axial Idioma: En Revista: RMD Open Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article