Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Ankle strength assessed by one repetition maximum: A new approach to detect weaknesses in chronic ankle lateral instability.
Aguilaniu, Aude; Schwartz, Cédric; Abran, Guillaume; Baudoux, Laura; Croisier, Prof Jean-Louis.
Afiliación
  • Aguilaniu A; LAM - Motion Lab, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium; Department of Physical Activity and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Liège, Belgium. Electronic address: aude.aguilaniu@uliege.be.
  • Schwartz C; LAM - Motion Lab, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium; Department of Physical Activity and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Liège, Belgium.
  • Abran G; LAM - Motion Lab, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium; Department of Physical Activity and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Liège, Belgium.
  • Baudoux L; Central University Hospital of Liège, Belgium.
  • Croisier PJ; LAM - Motion Lab, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium; Department of Physical Activity and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Liège, Belgium; Central University Hospital of Liège, Belgium.
Foot Ankle Surg ; 30(4): 349-353, 2024 Jun.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38429179
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Ankle muscle strength should be assessed after a lateral ankle sprain (LAS) because a strength deficit can lead to chronic ankle instability (CAI). No field method is available to obtain quantitative ankle dynamic strength values. This study aimed to assess the reliability of the one-repetition maximal (1-RM) method and to compare ankle muscle strength between healthy volunteers and those with CAI using 1-RM strength assessment approach.

METHODS:

We recruited 31 healthy volunteers and 32 with CAI. Dorsiflexor, evertor, and invertor 1-RM were performed twice at a one-week interval. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and minimal detectable change (MDC) were calculated. Strength values were compared between healthy volunteers and CAI.

RESULTS:

The 1-RM method is reliable for assessing ankle dorsiflexor, evertor, and invertor strength, with an ICC ranging from 0.76 to 0.88, and MDC ranging from 19 to 31%. Volunteers with CAI obtained evertor (3.0 vs. 3.5 N/kg), invertor (2.9 vs. 3.7 N/kg), and dorsiflexor (5.9 vs. 6.5 N/kg) strength values that were lower than healthy volunteers (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION:

The 1-RM test can be used in practice to assess evertor, invertor, and dorsiflexor strength during the rehabilitation of LAS. This field method could help practitioners to detect a strength deficit and individualize a strengthening programme if necessary.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Traumatismos del Tobillo / Fuerza Muscular / Inestabilidad de la Articulación / Articulación del Tobillo Idioma: En Revista: Foot Ankle Surg Asunto de la revista: ORTOPEDIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Traumatismos del Tobillo / Fuerza Muscular / Inestabilidad de la Articulación / Articulación del Tobillo Idioma: En Revista: Foot Ankle Surg Asunto de la revista: ORTOPEDIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article