Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Evaluating a targeted person-centred pain management intervention programme in lumbar spine surgery - a controlled segment-specific before-and-after interventional design.
Angelini, Eva; Wolf, Axel; Wijk, Helle; Brisby, Helena; Baranto, Adad.
Afiliación
  • Angelini E; Dept of Orthopaedics, Institute of Clinical Sciences, at Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden. eva.angelini@gu.se.
  • Wolf A; Institute of Health and Care Sciences, at Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden. eva.angelini@gu.se.
  • Wijk H; Institute of Health and Care Sciences, at Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
  • Brisby H; Institute of Nursing and Health Promotion, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway.
  • Baranto A; Dept of Anaesthesia, Operation & Intensive Care, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 24(1): 315, 2024 Mar 08.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38459528
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Postoperative pain management in lumbar spine surgery care remains a challenge. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of a person-centred postoperative pain management intervention programme on lumbar spine surgery patients on postoperative pain, shared decision-making, and satisfaction with postoperative pain management.

METHODS:

The study was performed with a controlled before-and-after interventional design in an orthopaedic unit at a university hospital. Person-centred pain management for patients undergoing spine surgery was developed in co-creation by a multi-professional team and implemented throughout the care pathway. The usual care group (pre-intervention) served as a comparison to the intervention group. Pain intensity, shared decision-making in pain management, and patient satisfaction with results of pain management, served as patient-reported measures, collected using the International Pain Outcomes questionnaire and analysed using descriptive statistics.

RESULTS:

The intervention showed no benefit for patients' pain and satisfaction, while shared decision-making in pain management was significant lower in the intervention group than in the conventional group. The per-protocol analysis showed no significant differences between groups.

CONCLUSION:

The initial assumption of the study, that the implementation of a co-created structured person-centred care pathway would improve patient-reported outcomes, was not confirmed. The periodically low fidelity to the intervention due to organizational constraints (due to sub-optimal organizational conditions and managerial support) may have affected the results.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Satisfacción del Paciente / Manejo del Dolor Idioma: En Revista: BMC Health Serv Res Asunto de la revista: PESQUISA EM SERVICOS DE SAUDE Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Satisfacción del Paciente / Manejo del Dolor Idioma: En Revista: BMC Health Serv Res Asunto de la revista: PESQUISA EM SERVICOS DE SAUDE Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article